-Caveat Lector-

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week602/juergensmeyer.html

THE MORAL WAR AGAINST IRAQ

by Mark Juergensmeyer

The punch line came at the end. Prior to that, President George W. Bush's speech to the
United Nations on Iraq seemed almost restrained. It was, to a large extent, a
straightforward litany of grievances -- promises broken, UN resolutions ignored. Only 
at the
end did the rhetoric of the speech begin to sound, well, rhetorical. In fact, it 
sounded
almost sermonic.

"We must choose," Bush said, "between a world of fear and a world of progress." This
stark dichotomy seemed to echo the words he used shortly after the September 11 attack 
a
year ago, when he said that nations should line up either for or against the war on
terrorism. What was chilling about the war language against al Qaeda was that it seemed
to mirror Osama bin Laden's own view of the world. Bin Laden, like many religious
extremists, was animated by the notion that a hidden cosmic war was behind many of the
evils of the world. Bush's war on terrorism rhetoric picked up that theme and directed 
it
against bin Laden himself.

Such a war allows for no bystanders. You are either "for us or against us," Bush said,
challenging the world a year ago. As he made his case for attacking Iraq, he again
presented the world with a stark moral dichotomy.

In the UN speech, Bush concluded with a kind of altar call, addressing directly the 
moral
conscience of each delegate. He told them that the United States would "make that 
stand"
against fear and in favor of progress, and then charged each delegate in the hall to
replicate the moral commitment he had made. "You have the power to make that stand,"
the president solemnly urged them.

The moral imagery of the war on terrorism was thus transferred to the war on Iraq. The
proposed Iraqi incursion, Bush seemed to say, is a struggle over ultimate values. It 
is not
just a matter of reining in an erratic and potentially dangerous rogue regime. It is a 
matter
of making profound and enduring choices: of choosing progress rather than fear, truth 
over
evil, light over darkness.

Political leaders often lean on absolute language - - especially images provided by 
religion
-- to buttress their political positions. It was this kind of language that animated 
the rhetoric
of political leaders during the Cold War. But what is interesting about the use of 
Manichean
language in the Iraq case is that the foe is not another USSR or China but a rather 
lonely,
unlikable despot in a Middle Eastern country with an economy comparable to that of a
moderate-sized county in the state of California.

Like Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein possesses relatively little real power -- at 
least at
present -- but he does have the ability to annoy America's leaders and scare its 
population.
Much of his danger is his unpredictability, the danger of the unknown.

No wonder, then, that quasi-religious language is invoked to prepare the world for 
such an
encounter. Saddam Hussein has become a symbol for fear itself -- and who in their right
minds would choose that over progress?

Mark Juergensmeyer is the author of TERROR IN THE MIND OF GOD: THE GLOBAL RISE OF
RELIGIOUS VIOLENCE and editor of GLOBAL RELIGION: AN INTRODUCTION, forthcoming
next year. He is professor of sociology and religious studies and director of global 
and
international studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to