-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 7/5/99 7:46:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> It's the sheer hypocrisy that boils me.
Sorry Prudy, you miss the mark again. It is not a question of whether it is
hypocrisy, which it clearly is. But it is now a question of just because we
let the other scum get away with it should we ALSO let Clinton get away with
it too? As you know I am no fan of Reagan, or Bush or any other politician,
but Clinton should in NO WAY be defended, because the underlying issue should
be when are we as a people going to finally say enough is enough? Clinton is
scum and is unworthy of the office, no one who came before has anything to do
with how we treat him. Judge him on his own (de)merits. IMO, the whole sex
issue is a non-issue and should never have been delved into in such
ridiculous ways (as I've already stated before, if he was screwing his dog on
his off duty hours that's his business and none of mine), the fact that it
may have interfered with his doing his job is important, but it is a lesser
issue than the other crap he has done or allowed to happen while in office.
The fact that Bush got away with something, and Reagan got away with
something, or that the press is biased, or the "right wingers" are in control
have nothing to do with the issue of President Clinton and judging his
actions while in office and making a determination as to his fitness. Just
because Bush did it and got away with it unscathed is no reason to LET IT
CONTINUE with Clinton. Hey maybe Bush killed someone sometime (he might have
had a hand in the Kennedy assassination after all), and he got away with it.
I guess that means that if Clinton did the same thing we should just let him
go, because it would be hypocrisy to go after him when no one raised a stink
over Bush's actions? I guess it would just be stupid to all of the sudden
decide: "Hey! We got laws how about we hold the President accountable to
them?" I guess we should NEVER finally wake up and say enough is enough huh?
We should just judge everyone based on how they judged Reagan. Reagan was
old and had Alzheimer's so just cover up and forget all the crap he allowed
to happen under his watch. Same for Clinton, and everyone else who comes to
office in the future. No more hypocrisy for me. They're ALL innocent and
should just be left alone. Or are we just using this standard for Democrats
who are elected President?
Teo1000
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
