-Caveat Lector- ----- > Ashley Rye wrote: > > > > -> IUFO Mailing List > > > > What I'm beginning to more and more understand is that this > > lower fourth-dimensional level that this group operates from, > > this "Illuminati consciousness"-we'll put it like that-is the > > frequency range that vibrates to the emotions of fear and the > > off-shoots of fear, like guilt, resentment, aggression, all > > these things. And, therefore, the more that events can be > > created on the Earth which generate-my goodness me, they do > > by the minute-the emotions of fear, guilt, resentment, etc., > > within the human form, we are actually turned into generators > > of energy for that lower fourth-dimensional frequency range, > > if you follow me. Because every time we feel emotion, the > > emotion of fear, our thought-emotional patterns are > > resonating energy around us and within us to that frequency > > of fear, which appears to relate very strongly to this lower > > fourth-dimensional level. > > > > Now, where experiments have been done-I think the Institute > > of HeartMath in America has done a lot of this; it's got an > > Internet site, it's very interesting-they've done experiments > > measuring the frequency of various emotions, and they've > > shown that the frequency of fear is very low, slow. And when > > we're feeling fear, it is actually reasonating our energy > > very slowly. When we feel the emotion of what we call love, > > in it's truest sense, that is a very fast frequency which > > actually reasonates our energy very quickly. It's like waves > > going through and resonating the energy, which is just > > neutral. I mean, thought reasonates the energy. Do you want > > it fast? Do you want it slow? What were you thinking? What > > were you feeling? > > > > So the more-this is vital to understanding this on a higher > > level, I would suggest-the more that humanity lives it's life > > in fear and the off-shoot emotions that come from fear, the > > slower the vibrational reasonance of consciousness working > > directly through the physical form. If the highest expression > > of ourselves, beyond this lower fourth-dimensional "cess-pit" > > vibration, as I call it, is operating at a higher wavelength > > than fear, and ultimately at the wavelength of love, what I > > would suggest is the highest wavelength of all-just like > > Radio America cannot sync with Radio Philadelphia because > > they are on different wavelengths-the wavelength of fear > > cannot sync with the higher wavelengths of love and other > > states of being. > > > > So, in essence, as long as humanity can-in physical > > embodiment, that level of our consciousness-be kept and > > immersed in the emotion of fear, we actually vibrationally > > disconnect and can do nothing else, can do nothing other than > > disconnect from the highest expressions of who we are. We > > can't do anything other than that. > > > > So, coming to the question, Rick, and it's a very important > > one, "How do we get out of here?" and "Where are the good > > guys?"-I keep hearing, "Where are the people coming to help > > us?" > > > > Well, those of an emotional-mental state of being that wish > > to set-not in embodiment, I mean other-dimensional beings-who > > are of an intent to set the planet free, they are of a level > > of vibrational reasonance, as a result of that state of > > being, in which they cannot connect with consciousness that > > is in a state of fear. It simply cannot happen because there > > is a vibrational gap between the two. This is the vital point > > I would suggest, anyway. > > > > It's not that those of higher-dimensional consciousness who > > wish to set us free have to connect with us; it's that we, in > > fear, have need to connect with them. And the only way of > > doing that is through breaking out of fear; it's breaking out > > of the three-dimensional illusion, the movie screen, the > > holographic kind of virtual reality game that we're looking > > at when we open our eyes, and getting into the wavelength of > > love, in it's true sense. > > > > Because when we start to vibrate as a result of that state of > > being, to the energy of love, and our intent is freedom for > > all, not just ourselves, freedom in its true sense-freedom > > for you to say what I don't agree with, freedom for you to > > live your life-style in a way that I wouldn't live mine-that > > level of true freedom, that I will stand for your freedom to > > say something that I disagree with as much as I'll stand for > > mine to say what I think-when you hit that level, then your > > state of being starts to vibrate faster and faster, and > > starts to reach through this vibrational prison of > > low-vibrational emotion, fear overwhelmingly, and reconnect > > with the higher dimensions of ourselves; we start to become > > whole again. > > > > Then we become lights or beacons that can bring this > > higher-dimensional knowledge/consciousness/understanding into > > embodiment and start to become like broadcast transmitters of > > it, which starts to reasonate and change the energy field > > that we're living in, and starts to break-up this fear-based > > energy field that we've been living in all this time-and have > > been manipulated to add to every time we think and feel fear. > > > > So, again, it's about responsibility BY ME. It's not about > > saying, "Come and save us!" It's about saying, "How do we > > connect with those who can guide us out of this abyss?" > > > > What if this abyss is actually a lower vibrational energy > > field caused by the overwhelmingly dominating fear emotion on > > planet Earth. We have actually feared ourselves into a low > > vibrational state, which has put us into a vibrational prison > > controlled from this lower fourth dimension, which is expert > > at manipulating fear because that is the vibration of it's > > being. > > > > And if we could just turn that around and start resonating-by > > our own actions and our own thoughts and our own state of > > being-to the emotion of love, which is not "I love you > > darling because I saw you in the disco." Love is the ultimate > > power because it will speak it's truth and walk it's talk and > > do what it believes to be right, no matter what the > > consequences to itself. That's the kind of love I'm talking > > about. > > > > Because love has no fear-the emotion that actually takes our > > power away-so love without fear must be the ultimate power. > > If we can get into that state, we start to reconnect with > > those levels. So we say, "Where are they?" Well, they're > > sitting around waiting for us to connect with them, but WE > > have to make the connection. Otherwise these other higher > > dimensions, that are seeking to help us and of which we are a > > part, would have to come into the wavelength of fear to > > connect with us-which would actually defeat the object of the > > whole thing. > > > > Martin: You continually use the term "problem, reaction, > > solution". For those readers who are not aware what that is, > > would you explain? > > > > Icke: It's the most powerful mass-manipulation technique that > > has been used over thousands of years to advance this agenda > > to central, globalized control of all institutions of our > > lives. Kosovo, Bosnia, all of these different manipulated > > wars and problems-the Oklahoma City bombing, people going > > crazy with guns around the world, in schools and stuff, these > > are classic expressions of this. > > > > If you want to introduce something like gun control, I think > > on gun control we got manipulated into the wrong debate. > > Whether guns are good, or whether guns are bad is actually a > > debate worth having, but it's not the crucial debate at this > > moment because what's happened by pulling us into this debate > > of "are guns good or are guns bad?" is that it has actually > > diverted people from the debate which we should actually be > > having in light of these events-which is why we have this > > pattern all over the world. > > > > Because I travel a lot, I tell you, it's happening > > everywhere, people going crazy with guns, shooting people in > > the streets or schools, and then immediately legislation > > being proposed to take guns out of circulation. People should > > remember that gun laws were introduced in Germany just before > > Hitler started filling concentration camps. > > > > I don't have guns. I wouldn't use guns. I'm not into guns. I > > don't see the point in meeting violence with violence because > > you get twice the violence. But we need to get street wise. > > Some people would use guns, and on the face of it, it will be > > easier to take over an unarmed population than an armed > > population, on the face of it. That's not actually true, but > > on the face of it that appears to be true. And, therefore, > > what better than taking guns out of circulation before you've > > had your final coup, if you like. So, "problem, reaction, > > solution" overcomes the situation in which, if you introduced > > what you want to introduce, openly, then you know that it > > would be so unpopular that you would get tremendous > > resistance to it. > > > > For instance, if you wanted to give more power to the police, > > more power to the military, more power to stop and search, > > more power to go into your homes without permission, etc., > > and you did that openly without any of this other > > incentive-manipulation, there'd be tremendous resistance from > > people who say, "This is a global, fascist state!" or "This > > is a fascist country! You mustn't do this; we're not having > > it!" So "problem, reaction, solution" overcomes this. It's a > > brilliant technique, very simple, and it means that not only > > do you avoid such opposition, you actually manipulate people > > who would normally oppose what you want, to see it as the > > only solution to the problems that have been created and > > demand you introduce it. > > > > So, in Stage One, you create a problem. You make sure, > > however, someone else is blamed for it-a Timothy McVeigh, a > > Lee Harvey Oswald, President Milosevic, and all this > > stuff-you create a problem. You could create a war, as in > > Bosnia or Kosovo, you could create a "terrorist" bombing, a > > government collapse, an economic collapse, or whatever, a run > > on Wall Street, anything. > > > > You then get your problem, which you've covertly created, to > > be reported through your media in the way you want the people > > to perceive it. So, you report the Oklahoma City bombing as > > if it was due to a couple of guys in a barn somewhere who > > produced this fuel-fertilizer device which, of course, > > independent bomb experts have said couldn't possibly have > > caused that damage in the building. You then glean, as a > > result of this, the demand that "something must be done!" > > "What are they going to do about it?" "We can't have this; do > > something!" And so you've now had Stage One-create the > > problem. > > > > And you've also, at this point, had Stage Two-the public > > reaction: "Do something!" That allows you to play out the > > sting operation, called Stage Three, which is offering the > > "solutions" you wanted to impose in the first place, to the > > problems you have yourself created. > > > > So, if you take the Oklahoma City bombing for instance, > > within 24 hours of the event at the James P. Murrah federal > > building on April 19, 1995, you had Bill Clinton calling for > > an easing of restrictions on the military's involvement in > > domestic law enforcement. The Anti-Terrorism Bill, that went > > through Congress on the nod and took away basic freedoms in > > America, went through purely and totally because of the > > Oklahoma City bombing and as a reaction-solution to that > > problem. > > > > The more deeply you look into these events which are blamed > > on other people, the more clear it becomes that the people > > who proposed the legislation, afterwards, are the people who > > created the problem in the first place. And this is going on > > all the time. > > > > We've just seen a massive example of this. I've been writing > > in my books, and many other people have been too, that NATO > > is designed to become the world police force, in some form, > > maybe not even called NATO when it reaches that point, but > > certainly NATO is the vehicle through which the global police > > force is being orchestrated. > > > > In Bosnia, the First Stage of this, you had the UN > > peacekeeping operation as the status quo at the start of it. > > But that was massively exposed, on purpose, in a co-ordinated > > way as being next to useless. At the same time, horrific > > pictures were pouring through our television screens night > > after night, of horrors in Bosnia. This, of course, led to > > calls-as a result of this problem "something must be done!" > > And the solution was a 60,000-strong world army, under NATO > > control, that took over in Bosnia. And, as I've shown in my > > books and talks, every major peace negotiator appointed by > > the UN or the European Union to end the war in Bosnia-but no, > > they didn't, of course-was a member of the Bilderberg Group, > > the Trilateral Commission, and the Council on Foreign > > Relations, sometimes all three. > > > > Then, as a result of Bosnia, the status quo was changed from > > reacting to these events with a UN peacekeeping operation, to > > reacting to them with NATO. So when they play Stage Two of > > this game, and that's all it is, this is not the end of it, > > Kosovo-there was no talk of UN peacekeeping > > operations-straight away, the status quo was NATO reacting to > > Kosovo. And if people only looked at it, it's just a mirror > > of Bosnia because there were no pictures. > > > > I'm not saying Milosevic is a nice man, but I want to know > > who's actually controlling him, and who's controlling the > > Kosovo Liberation Army, etc., and all these various groups in > > this conflict. And I'm absolutely in no doubt that if you did > > the research, you'd find that the people who control NATO are > > the same people controlling Milosevic, the same people > > controlling the Kosovo Liberation Army, etc., because you > > need to control different sides in a game to insure certainty > > that the outcome is the one that you want it to be. > > > > It was interesting that one of Milosevic's advisors during > > the Bosnian conflict was one of the key advisers, a few years > > earlier, to Margaret Thatcher-just a coincidence, nothing to > > worry about. So we have these horrendous pictures coming out > > of Kosovo of these refugees pouring across the border and > > people forget that those pictures only started after the NATO > > bombing. And the NATO bombing actually massively, massively > > expanded the problem while claiming to be the solution. And > > what you have now, of course, is what they wanted all along, > > which is ground troops in Kosovo, and now they've got control > > of Kosovo and that whole area. > > > > Visit Ash's Mural Gallery at: > > > > http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Museum/3517/Ash/index.html > > > > -> Send "subscribe iufo " to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -> Posted by: Ashley Rye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
