The problem these Gnostics garbed in the skirt of "scientism" have is that
they do not comprehend that their own philosophy of "Maya" is an "Illusion!"
The so-called "Holographic Universe" is merely a regurgitated form of amoral
Hindu Pantheism, which in itself is a fundamentally slavish dogma that
craves the subjugation and dissolution of the individual spirit into the
communist-like universal "oneness".
The Gnostics are, and were, obsessed with phantoms, evil spirits and the
evil demiurge "god".
Much of the New Testament contains harsh polemic against the Gnostics and
their inherent glib view of life and humanity and their paranoid sense of
the Cosmic Grim.
In some sense, from what I read of the US history, at the apex of the JFK
assassination the US as nation embarked on a course toward national
Gnosticism. This Gnostic dialectic was and is compounded by the incessant
paranoia of "Conspiracy Theory" which itself tends toward fatalism and a
sense of powerlessness against the seemingly insurmountable powers of
darkness.
Heretical so-called "christian" Gnostics were historically the first to
surrender liberty, property, and life to the power of the State, since,
inherently they held that the material world and physical body, were evil
and of the evil "god" and only the "spirit" was meaningful.
Many of the more ascetic Gnostics, in droves, threw themselves over cliffs
to their bloody and broken deaths as they sought "freedom" from the flesh
and materialism world.
Cultists in the "Heavens Gate" sect were essentially Gnostic and like their
ancient counterparts, sought their "freedom" from the material world through
communal suicide.
Beware of Gnostics and gurus draped in scientists overcoats!
----- Original Message -----
From: "tenebroust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fw: Magic = technology we don't understand
> Thank you Bob! What a great article, it fits in nicely with my own views
of "reality" as we "know" it. It is nice to know that there are some "real"
scientists out there who hold this view of reality as Maya. It opens up
worlds of possibilities.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 18 April 2000, "Robert F. Tatman" wrote:
>
> >
> > The sender of this message included the following comment: "I don't know
the
> > origin of this essay -- somebody copied it onto another list I'm on, but
it
> > is an eye opener -- among
> > other things it shows underlying ideas behind the magical law of
contagion."
> >
> > My own reaction was that it validates the observation in *Illuminatus*
that
> > "reality is a consensus statement."
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ambrose Hawk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <snipped>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 1:26 PM
> > Subject: Magic = technology we don't understand
> >
> >
> > > The Universe as a Hologram
> > >
> > > Does Objective Reality Exist, or is the Universe a Phantasm?
> > >
> > > In 1982 a remarkable event took place. At the University of Paris, a
> > > research team led by physicist Alain Aspect performed what may turn
out to
> > > be one of the most important experiments of the 20th century. You did
not
> > > hear about it on the evening news. In fact, unless you are in the
habit of
> > > reading scientific journals you probably have never even heard
Aspect's
> > > name, though there are some who believe his discovery may change the
face
> > of
> > > science.
> > >
> > > Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances
subatomic
> > > particles such as electrons are able to instantaneously communicate
with
> > > each other regardless of the distance separating them. It doesn't
matter
> > > whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion miles apart. Somehow each
particle
> > > always seems to know what the other is doing. The problem with this
feat
> > is
> > > that it violates Einstein's long-held tenet that no communication can
> > travel
> > > faster than the speed of light. Since traveling faster than the speed
of
> > > light is tantamount to breaking the time barrier, this daunting
prospect
> > has
> > > caused some physicists to try to come up with elaborate ways to
explain
> > away
> > > Aspect's findings. But it has inspired others to offer even more
radical
> > > explanations.
> > >
> > > University of London physicist David Bohm, for example,believes
Aspect's
> > > findings imply that objective reality does not exist, that despite its
> > > apparent solidity the universe is at heart a phantasm, a gigantic and
> > > splendidly detailed hologram. To understand why Bohm makes this
startling
> > > assertion, one must first understand a little about holograms. A
hologram
> > is
> > > a three-dimensional photograph made with the aid of a laser.
> > >
> > > To make a hologram, the object to be photographed is first bathed in
the
> > > light of a laser beam. Then a second laser beam is bounced off the
> > reflected
> > > light of the first and the resulting interference pattern (the area
where
> > > the two laser beams commingle) is captured on film. When the film is
> > > developed, it looks like a meaningless swirl of light and dark lines.
But
> > as
> > > soon as the developed film is illuminated by another laser beam, a
> > > three-dimensional image of the original object appears.
> > >
> > > The three-dimensionality of such images is not the only remarkable
> > > characteristic of holograms. If a hologram of a rose is cut in half
and
> > then
> > > illuminated by a laser, each half will still be found to contain the
> > entire
> > > image of the rose. Indeed, even if the halves are divided again, each
> > > snippet of film will always be found to contain a smaller but intact
> > version
> > > of the original image. Unlike normal photographs, every part of a
hologram
> > > contains all the information possessed by the whole.
> > >
> > > The "whole in every part" nature of a hologram provides us with an
> > entirely
> > > new way of understanding organization and order. For most of its
history,
> > > Western science has labored under the bias that the best way to
understand
> > a
> > > physical phenomenon, whether a frog or an atom, is to dissect it and
study
> > > its respective parts. A hologram teaches us that some things in the
> > universe
> > > may not lend themselves to this approach. If we try to take apart
> > something
> > > constructed holographically, we will not get the pieces of which it is
> > made,
> > > we will only get smaller wholes.
> > >
> > > This insight suggested to Bohm another way of understanding Aspect's
> > > discovery. Bohm believes the reason subatomic particles are able to
remain
> > > in contact with one another regardless of the distance separating them
is
> > > not because they are sending some sort of mysterious signal back and
> > forth,
> > > but because their separateness is an illusion. He argues that at some
> > deeper
> > > level of reality such particles are not individual entities, but are
> > > actually extensions of the same fundamental something.
> > >
> > > To enable people to better visualize what he means, Bohm offers the
> > > following illustration. Imagine an aquarium containing a fish. Imagine
> > also
> > > that you are unable to see the aquarium directly and your knowledge
about
> > it
> > > and what it contains comes from two television cameras, one directed
at
> > the
> > > aquarium's front and the other directed at its side.As you stare at
the
> > two
> > > television monitors, you might assume that the fish on each of the
screens
> > > are separate entities. After all, because the cameras are set at
different
> > > angles, each of the images will be slightly different. But as you
continue
> > > to watch the two fish, you will eventually become aware that there is
a
> > > certain relationship between them. When one turns, the other also
makes a
> > > slightly different but corresponding turn; when one faces the front,
the
> > > other always faces toward the side. If you remain unaware of the full
> > scope
> > > of the situation, you might even conclude that the fish must be
> > > instantaneously communicating with one another, but this is clearly
not
> > the
> > > case.
> > >
> > > This, says Bohm, is precisely what is going on between the subatomic
> > > particles in Aspect's experiment. According to Bohm, the apparent
> > > faster-than-light connection between subatomic particles is really
telling
> > > us that there is a deeper level of reality we are not privy to, a more
> > > complex dimension beyond our own that is analogous to the aquarium.
And,
> > he
> > > adds, we view objects such as subatomic particles as separate from one
> > > another because we are seeing only a portion of their reality. Such
> > > particles are not separate "parts", but facets of a deeper and more
> > > underlying unity that is ultimately as holographic and indivisible as
the
> > > previously mentioned rose. And since everything in physical reality is
> > > comprised of these "eidolons", the universe is itself a projection, a
> > > hologram.
> > >
> > > In addition to its phantomlike nature, such a universe would possess
other
> > > rather startling features. If the apparent separateness of subatomic
> > > particles is illusory, it means that at a deeper level of reality all
> > things
> > > in the universe are infinitely interconnected.The electrons in a
carbon
> > atom
> > > in the human brain are connected to the subatomic particles that
comprise
> > > every salmon that swims, every heart that beats, and every star that
> > > shimmers in the sky. Everything interpenetrates everything, and
although
> > > human nature may seek to categorize and pigeonhole and subdivide, the
> > > various phenomena of the universe, all apportionments are of necessity
> > > artificial and all of nature is ultimately a seamless web.
> > >
> > > In a holographic universe, even time and space could no longer be
viewed
> > as
> > > fundamentals. Because concepts such as location break down in a
universe
> > in
> > > which nothing is truly separate from anything else, time and
> > > three-dimensional space, like the images of the fish on the TV
monitors,
> > > would also have to be viewed as projections of this deeper order. At
its
> > > deeper level reality is a sort of superhologram in which the past,
> > present,
> > > and future all exist simultaneously. This suggests that given the
proper
> > > tools it might even be possible to someday reach into the
superholographic
> > > level of reality and pluck out scenes from the long-forgotten past.
> > >
> > > What else the superhologram contains is an open-ended question.
Allowing,
> > > for the sake of argument, that the superhologram is the matrix that
has
> > > given birth to everything in our universe, at the very least it
contains
> > > every subatomic particle that has been or will be -- every
configuration
> > of
> > > matter and energy that is possible, from snowflakes to quasars, from
blue
> > > whales to gamma rays. It must be seen as a sort of cosmic storehouse
of
> > > "All That Is."
> > >
> > > Although Bohm concedes that we have no way of knowing what else might
lie
> > > hidden in the superhologram, he does venture to say that we have no
reason
> > > to assume it does not contain more. Or as he puts it, perhaps the
> > > superholographic level of reality is a "mere stage" beyond which lies
"an
> > > infinity of further development".Bohm is not the only researcher who
has
> > > found evidence that the universe is a hologram. Working independently
in
> > the
> > > field of brain research, Standford neurophysiologist Karl Pribram has
also
> > > become persuaded of the holographic nature of reality.
> > >
> > > Pribram was drawn to the holographic model by the puzzle of how and
where
> > > memories are stored in the brain. For decades numerous studies have
shown
> > > that rather than being confined to a specific location, memories are
> > > dispersed throughout the brain. In a series of landmark experiments in
the
> > > 1920s, brain scientist Karl Lashley found that no matter what portion
of a
> > > rat's brain he removed he was unable to eradicate its memory of how to
> > > perform complex tasks it had learned prior to surgery. The only
problem
> > was
> > > that no one was able to come up with a mechanism that might explain
this
> > > curious "whole in every part" nature of memory storage.
> > >
> > > Then in the 1960s Pribram encountered the concept of holography and
> > realized
> > > he had found the explanation brain scientists had been looking for.
> > Pribram
> > > believes memories are encoded not in neurons, or small groupings of
> > neurons,
> > > but in patterns of nerve impulses that crisscross the entire brain in
the
> > > same way that patterns of laser light interference crisscross the
entire
> > > area of a piece of film containing a holographic image. In other
words,
> > > Pribram believes the brain is itself a hologram.
> > >
> > > Pribram's theory also explains how the human brain can store so many
> > > memories in so little space. It has been estimated that the human
brain
> > has
> > > the capacity to memorize something on the order of 10 billion bits of
> > > information during the average human lifetime (or roughly the same
amount
> > of
> > > information contained in five sets of the Encyclopaedia Britannica).
> > > Similarly, it has been discovered that in addition to their other
> > > capabilities, holograms possess an astounding capacity for information
> > > storage--simply by changing the angle at which the two lasers strike a
> > piece
> > > of photographic film, it is possible to record many different images
on
> > the
> > > same surface. It has been demonstrated that one cubic centimeter of
film
> > can
> > > hold as many as 10 billion bits of information.
> > >
> > > Our uncanny ability to quickly retrieve whatever information we need
from
> > > the enormous store of our memories becomes more understandable if the
> > brain
> > > functions according to holographic principles. If a friend asks you to
> > tell
> > > him what comes to mind when he says the word "zebra", you do not have
to
> > > clumsily sort back through some gigantic and cerebral alphabetic file
to
> > > arrive at an answer. Instead, associations like "striped",
"horselike",
> > and
> > > "animal native to Africa" all pop into your head instantly.Indeed, one
of
> > > the most amazing things about the human thinking process is that every
> > piece
> > > of information seems instantly cross- correlated with every other
piece of
> > > information--another feature intrinsic to the hologram. Because every
> > > portion of a hologram is infinitely interconnected with every other
> > portion,
> > > it is perhaps nature's supreme example of a cross-correlated system.
> > >
> > > The storage of memory is not the only neurophysiological puzzle that
> > becomes
> > > more tractable in light of Pribram's holographic model of the brain.
> > Another
> > > is how the brain is able to translate the avalanche of frequencies it
> > > receives via the senses (light frequencies, sound frequencies, and so
on)
> > > into the concrete world of our perceptions. Encoding and decoding
> > > frequencies is precisely what a hologram does best. Just as a hologram
> > > functions as a sort of lens, a translating device able to convert an
> > > apparently meaningless blur of frequencies into a coherent image,
Pribram
> > > believes the brain also comprises a lens and uses holographic
principles
> > to
> > > mathematically convert the frequencies it receives through the senses
into
> > > the inner world of our perceptions.
> > >
> > > An impressive body of evidence suggests that the brain uses
holographic
> > > principles to perform its operations. Pribram's theory, in fact, has
> > gained
> > > increasing support among neurophysiologists. Argentinian-Italian
> > researcher
> > > Hugo Zucarelli recently extended the holographic model into the world
of
> > > acoustic phenomena. Puzzled by the fact that humans can locate the
source
> > of
> > > sounds without moving their heads, even if they only possess hearing
in
> > one
> > > ear, Zucarelli discovered that holographic principles can explain this
> > > ability. Zucarelli has also developed the technology of holophonic
sound,
> > a
> > > recording technique able to reproduce acoustic situations with an
almost
> > > uncanny realism.
> > >
> > > Pribram's belief that our brains mathematically construct "hard"
reality
> > by
> > > relying on input from a frequency domain has also received a good deal
of
> > > experimental support. It has been found that each of our senses is
> > sensitive
> > > to a much broader range of frequencies than was previously
> > > suspected.Researchers have discovered, for instance, that our visual
> > systems
> > > are sensitive to sound frequencies, that our sense of smell is in part
> > > dependent on what are now called "osmic frequencies", and that even
the
> > > cells in our bodies are sensitive to a broad range of frequencies.
Such
> > > findings suggest that it is only in the holographic domain of
> > consciousness
> > > that such frequencies are sorted out and divided up into conventional
> > > perceptions.
> > >
> > > But the most mind-boggling aspect of Pribram's holographic model of
the
> > > brain is what happens when it is put together with Bohm's theory. For
if
> > the
> > > concreteness of the world is but a secondary reality and what is
"there"
> > is
> > > actually a holographic blur of frequencies, and if the brain is also a
> > > hologram and only selects some of the frequencies out of this blur and
> > > mathematically transforms them into sensory perceptions, what becomes
of
> > > objective reality? Put quite simply, it ceases to exist. As the
religions
> > of
> > > the East have long upheld, the material world is Maya, an illusion,
and
> > > although we may think we are physical beings moving through a physical
> > > world, this too is an illusion. We are really "receivers" floating
through
> > a
> > > kaleidoscopic sea of frequency, and what we extract from this sea and
> > > transmogrify into physical reality is but one channel from many
extracted
> > > out of the superhologram.
> > >
> > > This striking new picture of reality, the synthesis of Bohm and
Pribram's
> > > views, has come to be called the holographic paradigm, and although
many
> > > scientists have greeted it with skepticism, it has galvanized others.
A
> > > small but growing group of researchers believe it may be the most
accurate
> > > model of reality science has arrived at thus far. More than that, some
> > > believe it may solve some mysteries that have never before been
> > explainable
> > > by science and even establish the paranormal as a part of nature.
> > >
> > > Numerous researchers, including Bohm and Pribram, have noted that many
> > > para-psychological phenomena become much more understandable in terms
of
> > the
> > > holographic paradigm. In a universe in which individual brains are
> > actually
> > > indivisible portions of the greater hologram and everything is
infinitely
> > > interconnected, telepathy may merely be the accessing of the
holographic
> > > level. It is obviously much easier to understand how information can
> > travel
> > > from the mind of individual 'A' to that of individual 'B' at a far
> > distance
> > > point and helps to understand a number of unsolved puzzles in
psychology.
> > In
> > > particular, Grof feels the holographic paradigm offers a model for
> > > understanding many of the baffling phenomena experienced by
individuals
> > > during altered states of consciousness.
> > >
> > > In the 1950s, while conducting research into the beliefs of LSD as a
> > > psychotherapeutic tool, Grof had one female patient who suddenly
became
> > > convinced she had assumed the identity of a female of a species of
> > > prehistoric reptile. During the course of her hallucination, she not
only
> > > gave a richly detailed description of what it felt like to be
encapsuled
> > in
> > > such a form, but noted that the portion of the male of the species's
> > anatomy
> > > was a patch of colored scales on the side of its head. What was
startling
> > to
> > > Grof was that although the woman had no prior knowledge about such
things,
> > a
> > > conversation with a zoologist later confirmed that in certain species
of
> > > reptiles colored areas on the head do indeed play an important role as
> > > triggers of sexual arousal.
> > >
> > > The woman's experience was not unique. During the course of his
research,
> > > Grof encountered examples of patients regressing and identifying with
> > > virtually every species on the evolutionary tree (research findings
which
> > > helped influence the man-into-ape scene in the movie Altered States).
> > > Moreover, he found that such experiences frequently contained obscure
> > > zoological details which turned out to be accurate.
> > >
> > > Regressions into the animal kingdom were not the only puzzling
> > psychological
> > > phenomena Grof encountered. He also had patients who appeared to tap
into
> > > some sort of collective or racial unconscious. Individuals with little
or
> > no
> > > education suddenly gave detailed descriptions of Zoroastrian funerary
> > > practices and scenes from Hindu mythology. In other categories of
> > > experience, individuals gave persuasive accounts of out-of-body
journeys,
> > of
> > > precognitive glimpses of the future, of regressions into apparent
> > past-life
> > > incarnations.
> > >
> > > In later research, Grof found the same range of phenomena manifested
in
> > > therapy sessions which did not involve the use of drugs. Because the
> > common
> > > element in such experiences appeared to be the transcending of an
> > > individual's consciousness beyond the usual boundaries of ego and/or
> > > limitations of space and time, Grof called such manifestations
> > > "transpersonal experiences", and in the late '60s he helped found a
branch
> > > of psychology called "transpersonal psychology" devoted entirely to
their
> > > study.
> > >
> > > Although Grof's newly founded Association of Transpersonal Psychology
> > > garnered a rapidly growing group of like-minded professionals and has
> > become
> > > a respected branch of psychology, for years neither Grof or any of his
> > > colleagues were able to offer a mechanism for explaining the bizarre
> > > psychological phenomena they were witnessing. But that has changed
with
> > the
> > > advent of the holographic paradigm.
> > >
> > > As Grof recently noted, if the mind is actually part of a continuum, a
> > > labyrinth that is connected not only to every other mind that exists
or
> > has
> > > existed, but to every atom, organism, and region in the vastness of
space
> > > and time itself,the fact that it is able to occasionally make forays
into
> > > the labyrinth and have transpersonal experiences no longer seems so
> > strange.
> > >
> > > The holographic paradigm also has implications for so-called hard
sciences
> > > like biology. Keith Floyd, a psychologist at Virginia Intermont
College,
> > has
> > > pointed out that if the concreteness of reality is but a holographic
> > > illusion, it would no longer be true to say the brain produces
> > > consciousness. Rather, it is consciousness that creates the appearance
of
> > > the brain as well as the body and everything else around us we
interpret
> > as
> > > physical.
> > >
> > > Such a turnabout in the way we view biological structures has caused
> > > researchers to point out that medicine and our understanding of the
> > healing
> > > process could also be transformed by the holographic paradigm. If the
> > > apparent physical structure of the body is but a holographic
projection of
> > > consciousness, it becomes clear that each of us is much more
responsible
> > for
> > > our health than current medical wisdom allows. What we now view as
> > > miraculous remissions of disease may actually be due to changes in
> > > consciousness which in turn effect changes in the hologram of the
body.
> > >
> > > Similarly, controversial new healing techniques such as visualization
may
> > > work so well because in the holographic domain of thought images are
> > > ultimately as real as "reality".Even visions and experiences involving
> > > "non-ordinary" reality become explainable under the holographic
paradigm.
> > In
> > > his book "Gifts of Unknown Things," biologist Lyall Watson describes
his
> > > encounter with an Indonesian shaman woman who, by performing a ritual
> > dance,
> > > was able to make an entire grove of trees instantly vanish into thin
air.
> > > Watson relates that as he and another astonished onlooker continued to
> > watch
> > > the woman, she caused the trees to reappear, then "click" off again
and on
> > > again several times in succession.
> > >
> > > Although current scientific understanding is incapable of explaining
such
> > > events, experiences like this become more tenable if "hard" reality is
> > only
> > > a holographic projection.Perhaps we agree on what is "there" or "not
> > there"
> > > because what we call consensus reality is formulated and ratified at
the
> > > level of the human unconscious at which all minds are infinitely
> > > interconnected.If this is true, it is the most profound implication of
the
> > > holographic paradigm of all, for it means that experiences such as
> > Watson's
> > > are not commonplace only because we have not programmed our minds with
the
> > > beliefs that would make them so. In a holographic universe there are
no
> > > limits to the extent to which we can alter the fabric of reality.
> > >
> > > What we perceive as reality is only a canvas waiting for us to draw
upon
> > it
> > > any picture we want. Anything is possible, from bending spoons with
the
> > > power of the mind to the phantasmagoric events experienced by
Castaneda
> > > during his encounters with the Yaqui brujo don Juan, for magic is our
> > > birthright, no more or less miraculous than our ability to compute the
> > > reality we want when we are in our dreams.Indeed, even our most
> > fundamental
> > > notions about reality become suspect, for in a holographic universe,
as
> > > Pribram has pointed out, even random events would have to be seen as
based
> > > on holographic principles and therefore determined. Synchronicities or
> > > meaningful coincidences suddenly makes sense, and everything in
reality
> > > would have to be seen as a metaphor, for even the most haphazard
events
> > > would express some underlying symmetry.
> > >
> > > Whether Bohm and Pribram's holographic paradigm becomes accepted in
> > science
> > > or dies an ignoble death remains to be seen,but it is safe to say that
it
> > > has already had an influence on the thinking of many scientists. And
even
> > if
> > > it is found that the holographic model does not provide the best
> > explanation
> > > for the instantaneous communications that seem to be passing back and
> > forth
> > > between subatomic particles, at the very least, as noted by Basil
Hiley, a
> > > physicist at Birbeck College in London, Aspect's findings "indicate
that
> > we
> > > must be prepared to consider radically new views of reality".
> > >
> > > Larson Publications http://www.lightlink.com/larson
> > > Wisdom's Goldenrod http://www.goldenrod.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
> > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> > ==========
> > CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
> > screeds are unwelcomed. Substance-not soap-boxing-please! These are
sordid
> > matters
> > and 'conspiracy theory'-with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
> > frauds-is used politically by different groups with major and minor
effects
> > spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
> > gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
> > be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
> > nazi's need not apply.
> >
> > Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> > ========================================================================
> > Archives Available at:
> > http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
> > <A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
> >
> > http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> > <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
> > ========================================================================
> > To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Om
>
> "Welcome to the desert of the real." Morpheus, in The Matrix
>
> "My God it's full of stars!" Dave Bowman, in 2001: A Space
> Odyssey
> ____________________________________________________________________
>
> For the largest MP3 index on the Web, go to http://mp3.altavista.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
>
> <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
> screeds are unwelcomed. Substance-not soap-boxing-please! These are
sordid
> matters
> and 'conspiracy theory'-with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
> frauds-is used politically by different groups with major and minor
effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
> <A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
>
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
