>Firstly this is a disussion group and nothing is being forced
>secondly your response is repeating the political formula's without thought
>Thirdly/..testing for peoplehood if I suggest that all people who commit
>abortions should have the responsibility of disposing of the non thing that
>has just died, what would most peoples reaction be?
>
>Also if the unborn baby is part of the mother only why is every cell
>different from the mother.
>And if an normal person went to have 3kg of healthy tissue removed a
normal
>hospital would treat them as crazy( you want your heart removed because you
>dont want it to beat?
>
Also secular religions have not clean hands ..name the secular grouping and
some of its offspring will have murder and certainty of purpose to its
cause. So murder of babies and old men are acceptable now, because that is
the present morality.
>The level of argument does not lie here however it lies in fundamental
>philosphies of utilitarianism versus communitarianism / contractualism.
>Utilitarians want the maximum benefit to existing productive individuals.
>That is why they can also easily talk about infanticide(peter singer) and
>euthenasia.
>The people who control the conspiracy favour this approach because it make
>people easier to manipulate via the media. (a strong group identity is
easier to manipulate from the inside but the one worlders are the perpetual
insider/outsiders)
>
>John
>
>PS I originally sent this in tolook at the use of language not abortion
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nessie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sunday, September 10, 2000 1:05 AM
>Subject: Re: [CTRL] Abortion and the English Language
>
>
>This is bogus logic, based on the a priori assumption that a fetus is a
>person. That a fetus is a person is not a fact, but a religious doctrine.
>As such it aplies only to the practitioners of those religions of which it
>is a tenet. Stop trying to cram your religion down the rest of our
>throats. Hasn't 1500 years of religious warfare been enough? When are you
>going to learn? Attempting to force your religion on others leads to
>violent resistance. Is that what you want?
>
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
