-Caveat Lector-
"c." wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> sorry steve but you are badly informed
>
> hemp is marijuana is hemp. different varieties. i don't care which badly
> informed info you have to underline your opinion. but it is just not so.
> i have been growing for over 10 years.
> what first hand experience have you?
>
I strongly recommend that you don't make a clear ststement like this
in " public."
J2
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 2:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] Hashish grows again in the fields of Lebanon
> (Independent UK) (fwd)
>
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > On 1 Jul 01, at 21:59, c. wrote:
> >
> > > marijuana is hemp is marijuana. just different strains give different
> > > emphasis- fruit or flesh.
> > >
> >
> > Not correct, c. Hemp and marijuana are related but different. Our
> governments would
> > like you to believe that they are the same however. Read on...
> >
> > http://zimafoods.ca/diff.html
> >
> > HEMP VS. MARIJUANA
> > Well now that you know how good the seed is, also how many uses there
> are for the
> > plant, what really is the difference between hemp
> > and marijuana?
> > Marijuana is a tobacco-like substance produced by drying the leaves and
> flowering
> > parts, or "buds", of the Cannabis plant. These particular
> > parts of the Cannabis plant are selected for illicit use due to the
> concentration of
> > tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, in those particular areas of the
> > plant. THC is the chemical present in marijuana that produces the drug
> user's
> > psychoactive, or "high", effect. Most wild
> > marijuana found growing in Canada and the United States has a THC
> concentration of
> > less 0.5 percent, compared to
> > Colombian or Mexican varieties with a THC content ranging normally between
> 3 to 7
> > percent. An increase has been noted by
> > law enforcement in recent years of large scale domestic production of
> marijuana
> > containing much higher THC values,
> > sometimes with a THC content as high as 25 percent.
> > Marijuana is normally used in its dry form by rolling the same into
> cigarettes, or "joints",
> > and smoked. A wide variety of other
> > smoking utensils, primarily in the form of pipes, are also used.
> > Hemp on the other hand is a non-psychoactive cannabis variety. Originally
> there was
> > no "marijuana" per say, just fields of hemp
> > grown for fibre, oils and livestock feed as well as food for humans. When
> the slaves of
> > the early 1800's began to realize that by
> > smoking the flowering tops of the hemp plant they achieved a measure of
> relief from
> > the horrible lives they were living as slaves! Thus began
> > the association between the "evil weed marijuana" and hemp.
> It was also the
> > Mexicans who were smoking the weed before
> > battle, the song "La Cucaracha" being about a soldier who
> refused to march
> > without some marijuana to smoke. Although
> > there are similarities, the differences are greater by far.
> >
> > Click here to see the ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA 1911 entry on hemp.
> >
> > Although many people think hemp and marijuana are the same it would be
> best to
> > describe them as cousins. Hemp is meant as an industrial
> > crop. Much like flax or cotton. Hemp can be used for many things, just
> check out the
> > uses page and see. Hemp is a wonder plant! If you leave
> > aside the 40,000 + products that can be made from hemp the mere fact that
> it has
> > survived the "US War on drugs" never ceases top amaze
> > me. People though don't realize that countries unaffected by US foreign
> policy didn't
> > stop growing hemp at all. Countries like Poland, Russia,
> > India and China to just name a few. Fortunately for us we can now go to
> these peoples
> > and regain the information we require to create our own
> > hemp industry right here in North America.
> > So why does the US have it's War on Drugs while Canada uses hemp to create
> a new
> > industry within it's borders? There seems to be a
> > definite difference in thinking between Health Canada's way of dealing
> with hemp and
> > the US's DEA. Why does Health Canada allow hemp to
> > be grown all across Canada while just a few kilometers south of the border
> the DEA is
> > actively spraying wild hemp in order to eradicate all
> > hemp from within it's borders?
> > That of course is not a one two three answer but simply put Health Canada
> is a branch
> > of the Government regulating health issues, getting it's
> > budget to do just that. The DEA under which the hemp issue is big
> business, $500
> > million US last year alone given to the organization to
> > eradicate wild hemp and that says nothing of the marijuana enforcement
> dollars. So in
> > short, by regulating the growth of the hemp industry in
> > Canada the government is creating jobs for the farmers and for the
> manufacturing
> > sector. If it were legalized in the states, the paramilitary like
> > DEA would lose a lot of it's funding and also it would lose face. The
> Government there
> > has worked long and hard, since 1937, to convince it's
> > peoples that hemp is bad, why change now and lose all of the lies it's
> created!
> >
> > and
> > http://www.azhemp.org/Package/Legal/legal.html
> >
> > HEMP vs. MARIJUANA
> >
> > The word "hemp" is English for a number of varieties of the cannabis
> plant, particularly
> > the varieties like "industrial hemp" that were bred over time for
> industrial uses such as
> > fuel, fiber, paper, seed, food, oil, etc.
> >
> > The term "marijuana" is of Spanish derivation, and was primarily used to
> describe
> > varieties of cannabis that were more commonly bred over time for medicinal
> and
> > recreational purposes, like cannabis indica , and certain strains of
> cannabis sativa.
> >
> > In fact, when all forms of hemp were made illegal in the early part of the
> last century, it
> > was used in the majority of the prescription drugs then sold in America.
> That was
> > certainly no accident. Those who favor the use of what is now called
> "medical
> > marijuana" recognize these strong medicinal qualities.
> >
> > But marijuana and the medical or recreational varieties of cannabis are
> not really at
> > issue today, because science readily allows us to distinguish them from
> industrial
> > hemp by simple tests for the huge difference in the potency of the plants,
> i.e. the
> > percentage of the psychotropic ingredient: delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
> ("THC"), the
> > active psychotropic ingredient found in the leaves and flowers of the
> female plant, but
> > not in her seeds or stems.
> >
> > Two cannabinoids are preponderant in cannabis: THC, the psychoactive
> ingredient,
> > and CBD, which is an antipsychoactive ingredient. Marijuana is high in the
> > psychoactive cannabinoid, THC, and low in the antipsychoactive
> cannabinoid, CBD.
> > The reverse is true for industrial hemp; when hemp was or is bred for its
> desirable
> > industrial qualities, the percentage of THC is minimal, while the
> percentage of CBD is
> > high.
> >
> > While marijuana has a potency range of 3% to 20% by dry weight of THC,
> industrial
> > hemp is generally defined as having less than 1.0% THC, and the normal
> range is
> > under 0.5%. These THC levels are so low that no one could get high from
> smoking it.
> > To receive a standard psychoactive dose would require a person to
> power-smoke 10-
> > 12 hemp cigarettes over an extremely short period of time. The large
> volume and high
> > temperature of vapor, gas and smoke would be almost impossible for a
> person to
> > withstand.
> >
> > Moreover, hemp contains a relatively high percentage of another
> cannabinoid, CBD,
> > that actually blocks the marijuana high. Hemp, it turns out, is not only
> not marijuana; it
> > could be called "antimarijuana."
> >
> > Feral hemp, or "ditchweed", is a remnant of the industrial hemp once grown
> on more
> > than 400,000 acres by U.S. farmers. It also contains extremely low levels
> of THC, as
> > low as .05 percent. It has no drug value, but does offer important
> environmental
> > benefits as a nesting habitat for birds. About 99 percent of the
> "marijuana" being
> > eradicated by the federal government-at great public expense-is this
> harmless
> > ditchweed.
> >
> > So industrial hemp or ditchweed simply does not have enough THC for any
> practical
> > use as a recreational drug, and anyone who grows industrial hemp will
> certainly have to
> > suffer the legal consequences of trying to grow marijuana. But that too is
> very unlikely
> > for a number of reasons:
> >
> > Industrial Hemp is grown quite differently from marijuana. Hemp plants are
> cultivated
> > inches apart to produce plants with tall stalks, while pot plants are
> short and spaced a
> > few feet apart to produce bushy, THC-rich flowers and leaves. Moreover,
> they are
> > harvested at different times.
> >
> > Marijuana cultivators also try to cull male plants to prevent
> fertilization of the female
> > plant. Unfertilized females produce more THC, making it attractive as a
> drug
> > (sinsemilla). In contrast, hemp production typically seeks fertilization
> to produce seeds.
> >
> >
> > And cross-pollination between hemp plants and marijuana plants would
> significantly
> > reduce the potency of the marijuana plant. If hemp does pollinate any
> nearby marijuana,
> > genetically, the result will always be lower-THC marijuana, not higher-THC
> hemp. "The
> > pot crop would always get weaker," Mahlberg said. If hemp is grown
> outdoors,
> > marijuana will not be grown close by to avoid producing lower-grade
> marijuana. A pot
> > grower would fear the inevitable pollen from hemp cultivation in a mixed
> plot, and would
> > not hide his plant in industrial hemp fields.
> >
> > Likewise, extracting THC from industrial hemp and further refining it to
> eliminate the
> > preponderance of CBD would require such an expensive, hazardous, and time-
> > consuming process that it is extremely unlikely anyone would ever attempt
> it, rather
> > than simply obtaining high-THC marijuana instead.
> >
> > [Also see: www.votehemp.com/PDF/myths_facts.pdf to review: Hemp and
> Marijuana --
> > Myths and Realities by Dr. Dave West, who holds a Ph.D. in Plant Breeding
> from the
> > University of Minnesota and has spent 18 years as a commercial corn
> breeder, and,
> > since 1993 he has served as an advisor to the emerging hemp industry
> regarding
> > industrial hemp germplasm.]
> >
> > All of this goes to show why, in countries where hemp is grown as an
> agricultural crop,
> > the police have experienced no such burdens. In fact, there are over 30
> nations on the
> > planet currently growing industrial hemp. These include Canada,
> Australia, England,
> > France, Germany, Austria, Spain, Russia, and China.
> >
> > The regulations established in these countries are simple: contract
> production, aerial
> > ASCS type maps of fields, only government certified low THC seed, pre- and
> post-
> > harvest field surveys, field checks on THC levels and an open field
> policy. And they do
> > not have an increased problem with prosecution for marijuana use. So
> legalizing hemp
> > would not burden local police forces.
> >
> > This explains why the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)
> recently
> > adopted a resolution strongly urging the U.S. Department of Agriculture
> (USDA), the
> > Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Office of National Drug
> Control Policy
> > (ONDCP) to collaboratively develop and adopt an official definition of
> industrial hemp.
> >
> > This also explains why legislation to deregulate industrial hemp and/or
> allow scientific
> > study by state universities is pending or passed in over 20 states:
> >
> > Bills Passed: ND, HI, MN, IL, MD -- Resolutions Passed:
> > AK, CA, KY, MT, VA, VT
> > Legislation In Process: SD, IA, ME, NH, NM, OR,
> TN --
> > Voter Initiatives: AK, CO, MI
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ANOMALOUS IMAGES
> > http://www.anomalous-images.com
> >
> > <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
> > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> > ==========
> > CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing
> propagandic
> > screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are
> > sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis-
> > directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with
> > major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and
> thought.
> > That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
> > always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
> > credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
> >
> > Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> > ========================================================================
> > Archives Available at:
> > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
> > <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
> >
> > http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> > <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
> > ========================================================================
> > To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Om
>
> <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
> screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
> sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
> directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
> major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
> That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
> always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
> credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
> <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
--
" It is important to note that 67.9243% of all
statistics are meaningless."- Albert Weinstein
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
