-Caveat Lector-

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/2/15/184547.shtml

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

MX Missile Retirement: Part of a Complex Shell Game
Dave Eberhart, NewsMax.com
Saturday, Feb. 16, 2002
In 1982 President Ronald Reagan concluded, "[T]he MX [Peacekeeper] is the
right missile at the right time…. The United States wants deep cuts in the
world's arsenal of weapons, but unless we demonstrate the will to rebuild our
strength and restore the military balance, the Soviets … have little
incentive to negotiate with us.”
Decades later, as the venerable Peacekeepers face a slow but inexorable
retirement, experts have given the world’s most powerful and complex ICBM
(ten, individually targeting W-87 warheads each) high marks, demonstrating
that Reagan was right on target.

More than even the original "Star Wars” missile shield, America’s deployment
of the MX missile was credited by many with accelerating the collapse of the
Soviet Union, which acknowledged that it could not afford to stand toe-to-toe
with the Pentagon’s technological superiority.

Even now in its twilight, the MX serves.

The planned retirement of the nation’s inventory of 50 of the giant weapons
has become part of the White House’s assuagement of Russia as the U.S.
breaches the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty by developing its "Son of
Star Wars” missile defense.

Russian President Boris Yeltsin pledged he would dismantle all of Russia's
giant SS-18 ICBMs in exchange for the MX retirement.

According to the Washington Post, the Air Force plans to stretch out the
dismantlement the missiles until 2007, taking one missile at a time from its
silo. All operational MX missiles are housed at F. E. Warren AFB in Wyoming.
Two of the 16 missiles slated for deactivation this year were "destroyed” in
January.

But even in death the ever-useful Peacekeeper will have life.

The 10 highly accurate and nuclear-hardened warheads from each missile are to
be packed off to the Pantex plant in Texas for storage, there to join an
ever-growing strategic reserve.

Under U.S. policy, an MX counts as "destroyed” if the top stage is
dismantled. The U.S. reserves the right to use the rest of the missile as a
launch vehicle for "satellites or other things.” This policy has long been a
bone of contention with the Russians that maintain the entire missile must be
destroyed.

The Shell Game

And therein the "shell game,” officially referred to as the "hedge” policy,
which would allow the United States to quickly ramp up its nuclear forces
back to Cold-War levels.

Like the MX warheads, most weapons removed from active status under the
Strategic Arms Reduction Treat [START I, II] go right to the inactive
stockpile to meet the "lead and hedge” requirements contained in the
administration’s Nuclear Policy Review.

The inactive stockpile was created in early 1990 to provide extra warheads
for reconstitution of part of the force, ostensibly in case arms control
expectations failed to materialize.

Consequently, although only about 5 percent of the total stockpile was in the
inactive category before START I, under START II the inactive stockpile could
increase to 50 percent or more.

And if that is not enough life after death for the MX, according to defense
expert William Arkin, a program is under way to extend the service life of
the missile’s W87 warhead by 40 years -- possibly for use on the Navy’s
Trident II missiles.

As the MX is brought off line, the nation’s ICBM clout will fall to the
arsenal of 500 Minuteman IIIs, currently the subject of an expensive
rehabilitation program ($4.5-billion) to replace guidance and propulsion
systems aboard the 1960s vintage missiles. According to the experts, the
refurbishment will keep the missiles in operational order until 2020.

However, said Arkin, the Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles
being upgraded program are less accurate and have a shorter range than the
ones they replace.

These shortcomings explain why the Air Force is contemplating the development
and eventual deployment of an all-new Minuteman IV ICBM. Work on the
state-of-the art ICBM could begin as early as 2004, said Air Force Maj. Gen.
Franklin J. Blaisdell recently.

The shell game has made more than the Russians uneasy.

Some Criticism

Although most applaud the Bush administration’s decision to drop the
strategic deployed arsenal from 6,000 to about 1,700 to 2,200, critics
suggest that the force levels at the end of the decade will be virtually the
same as those agreed to by President William Clinton and Boris Yeltsin in
1997.

Furthermore, because of the inactive stockpile, critics also see the U.S.
cutbacks as only paper reductions, rapidly reversible with the re-fitting of
missiles with the reserve warheads.

Administration officials say they must take into account multiple potential
opponents over the next decade. U.S. intelligence projections, however, are
that the usual suspects may have amassed fewer than 200 nuclear weapons over
the next decade.

When President Bill Clinton wanted to start dismantling some of the 50 ICBMs
before the Russian ratification of START II, Congress passed a bill
prohibiting reductions in the missile force until ratification was
accomplished.

When the Bush administration announced its desire to dismantle the missiles,
the House exempted the 50 MX missiles from the prohibition, and the Senate
eliminated the restriction altogether.

Subsequently, the Bush administration requested $5.1 million in its fiscal
2002 defense for the MX system. The Senate added $12.2 million to cover phase
one of dismantling the missiles.


*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
Write to same address to be off lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to