In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Nov 2007 05:22:30 -0600, "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
fullermd> Well, OK (and in my database, they're not on X.ctwm, fullermd> they're on free.lp.se:X.ctwm.compiler_errors, so even a viz fullermd> on X.ctwm there wouldn't show them?). But if prop doesn't fullermd> do so (why not?), how WOULD I have brought those changes in fullermd> so that they got certs for the X.ctwm branch? I mean, fullermd> they're SUPPOSED to be on that branch now, right? Shouldn't fullermd> they be noted as such? 1) if the "off side" branch really is free.lp.se:X.ctwm.compiler_errors, it should be visible to the rest of us, since my server accepts the glob "free.lp.se:X.ctwm*". There are already a few other subbranches that prove this. 2) mtn propagate only creates a new revision that is placed in the target branch, it doesn't add any branch certs to already existing revisions. But then, you didn't do a propagate either, you just commited 4da54949171b2cc1c5f467318daf87b683a77d9b into free.lp.se:X.ctwm, didn't you? Or alternatively, you simply added a branch cert to it? If you want all those revisions that are currently branch-less to the rest of us into free.lp.se:X.ctwm, you will simply have to add a branch cert to each of them, like this: mtn cert 6eb1af5f822cafe715c4e46f37ea3bc808e7a5f5 branch free.lp.se:X.ctwm But you know, before doing so, I'd like you to recheck that there's no spelling error in free.lp.se:X.ctwm.compiler_errors that made it fall outside of the pattern accepted by guardian. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis
