On Tue, 27 May 2008 20:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> delphij 2008-05-27 20:04:27 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) > include string.h > lib/libc/string Makefile.inc memchr.3 > sys/sys param.h > Added files: (Branch: RELENG_6) > lib/libc/string memrchr.c > Log: > MFC: Add memrchr(3). > > Obtained from: OpenBSD > > Revision Changes Path > 1.21.2.2 +1 -0 src/include/string.h > 1.34.8.2 +2 -1 src/lib/libc/string/Makefile.inc > 1.7.14.3 +28 -3 src/lib/libc/string/memchr.3 > 1.1.4.1 +40 -0 src/lib/libc/string/memrchr.c (new) > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/lib/libc/string/memrchr.c?rev=1.1.4.1&content-type=text/plain > 1.244.2.37 +1 -1 src/sys/sys/param.h > > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/include/string.h.diff?r1=1.21.2.1&r2=1.21.2.2 > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/lib/libc/string/Makefile.inc.diff?r1=1.34.8.1&r2=1.34.8.2 > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/lib/libc/string/memchr.3.diff?r1=1.7.14.2&r2=1.7.14.3 > http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/sys/sys/param.h.diff?r1=1.244.2.36&r2=1.244.2.37 There are two levels of symbol versions checking: 1. Up-front checking of version name. When binary starts, rtld checks that all versions it was compiled against are provided by the dynamically loaded libraries. I.e. if libc.so.7:FBSD_1.1 is recorded as a requirement in binary and given libc.so.7 does not have that version, the binary execution is terminated right on the spot. The assumption here is that if version FOO is claimed to be provided by the library then _all_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] binary might need are present. This is the level of symbol versions checking Solaris provides. Linux goes a bit further: 2. Per-symbol versions. In addition to the above, ld encodes required version of each undefined symbol in a binary and uses (name, version) pair to resolve undefined references as opposed to using only the symbol name. This allows for several versions of the same symbol to exist within the binary, i.e. something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are now possible. Your changes broke assumption in 1. To do it 100% correctly, we probably need to introduce a side version for memchr, something like memrchr@@FBSD_1.0a in stable branch and provide a compatibility alias [EMAIL PROTECTED] for it in -current at the same time. libc.so.7 from RELENG_7 will have: memrchr@@FBSD_1.0a libc.so.7 from -current then will have: memrchr@@FBSD_1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> memrchr@@FBSD_1.1 -- Alexander Kabaev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature