Hello Sven, Wednesday, November 15, 2006, 5:25:19 PM, you wrote:
>> It has been in the 6.6 branch since 16 Oct, but has only just entered >> the HEAD. [...] > The direction of merging is a little bit chaotic in recent times IMHO. In good > old CVS days we had the rule that changes from the HEAD should be pushed to > the branches where appropriate, not the other way round. It would be good if > we used this rule again IHMO, as it makes tracking things easier (by humans, > at least). i also think that it will be great if Ian just makes stable repositories inaccessible for Simons :) but this particular patch was made by SOF who is working with 6.6 and just that his program start working. what is your proposal for such cases? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
