duncan.coutts: > > On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 16:35 -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > > igloo: > > > Sun Jun 1 11:14:51 PDT 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Bump version to 0.9.0.2 > > > > > > M ./bytestring.cabal -1 +1 > > > > Note that pick this number means it'll clash with version 0.9.0.2 > > released last year. > > > > > > http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/bytestring-0.9.0.2 > > Upload date Sun Dec 16 15:19:16 PST 2007 > > Uploaded by DonaldStewart > > > > These GHC-only minor tags need there own namespace perhaps? > > It should be able to use one of the actual bytestring releases. In this > case it needs to be the same api as in 0.9.0.1, so the appropriate > version should be 0.9.0.4 since that is supposed to have exactly the > same API. As it happens we made a mistake in 0.9.0.2 if I recall > correctly and made a minor api change (compatible addition, not breaking > change). I don't recall what it was, you'd have to diff to find it. > > So I think either ghc-6.8.3 should use the existing bytestring-0.9.0.4 > release or we should do another bytestring-0.9.0.5 release with the > fixes but without the api addition.
Or ghc 6.8.3 could not bump their bytestring branch, if there were no changes. _______________________________________________ Cvs-libraries mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-libraries
