On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 16:59 -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > > So I think either ghc-6.8.3 should use the existing bytestring-0.9.0.4 > > release or we should do another bytestring-0.9.0.5 release with the > > fixes but without the api addition. > > Or ghc 6.8.3 could not bump their bytestring branch, if there were no > changes.
There has been one change since ghc-6.8.2: Sun Jun 1 19:14:51 BST 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Bump version to 0.9.0.2 Fri May 16 14:07:29 BST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Remove bogus rule for seq I'm removing a rule for seq that Don and Roman say is a vestige of old code, and which doesn't work with the new desugaring for seq. Sat Dec 15 15:48:51 GMT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tagged GHC 6.8.2 release Did the new desugaring for seq get included into ghc-6.8.3 or just 6.9? If the latter then this patch is not needed and no version bump is required. Duncan _______________________________________________ Cvs-libraries mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-libraries
