duncan.coutts: > > On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 16:59 -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > > > > So I think either ghc-6.8.3 should use the existing bytestring-0.9.0.4 > > > release or we should do another bytestring-0.9.0.5 release with the > > > fixes but without the api addition. > > > > Or ghc 6.8.3 could not bump their bytestring branch, if there were no > > changes. > > There has been one change since ghc-6.8.2: > > Sun Jun 1 19:14:51 BST 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Bump version to 0.9.0.2 > > Fri May 16 14:07:29 BST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * Remove bogus rule for seq > > I'm removing a rule for seq that Don and Roman say is a vestige > of old code, and which doesn't work with the new desugaring for > seq. > > > Sat Dec 15 15:48:51 GMT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > tagged GHC 6.8.2 release > > > Did the new desugaring for seq get included into ghc-6.8.3 or just 6.9? > If the latter then this patch is not needed and no version bump is > required.
And the patch wasn't needed anyway -- it was a patch to dead code. -- Don _______________________________________________ Cvs-libraries mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-libraries
