On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:27:54AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:13:52PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > >> Should this rebase maybe be a Cygwin, not MinGW version? (So that > >> we can use POSIX paths with it?) > > > >My very first version was a Cygwin app. I converted it to Mingw when > >Chuck pointed out imagehlp.dll is dependent on msvcrt.dll. Now that > >I'm using Ralf's imagehelper library we have a choice (unless > >rebasing cygwin1.dll is a requirement). Although, I waffle on the > >Cygwin vs. Mingw issues, I'm leaning toward Mingw. > > The only reason I can think of to make it a cygwin app (and I think it > is a powerful one) is for the path issues. If someone wants to rebase > cygwin, maybe the README could tell them how to do that, e.g., make a > copy, rebase that, use Windows tools to copy the rebased DLL back to > cygwin1.dll.
What is the consensus on Cygwin vs. Mingw? We already have 2.75 votes for Cygwin. :,) I won't mind replacing getopt() with popt anyway. Thanks, Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
