On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 05:21:57PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: > > What is the consensus on Cygwin vs. Mingw? We already have 2.75 > > votes for Cygwin. :,) I won't mind replacing getopt() with popt > > anyway. > > Problem: If it was Cygwin, it couldn't use any other Cygwin dll - like > cygpopt-0.dll (it might need to rebase them).
What about linking statically with popt? > IMO, we already have strace & cygcheck that don't do Cygwin paths. It > might be better to get rebase in as is, and think about this as a > possible long term enhancement (you know, that lightweight path > translation library mentioned as a possibility in the setup TODO). I guess that we are down to 1.75 votes for Cygwin. :,) Any other votes? Thanks, Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6