On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:26:47PM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote: > > >Lapo Luchini wrote: >> Lapo Luchini wrote: >> >>> Files? >>> http://www.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone-0.25-1.tar.bz2 >>> http://www.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone-0.25-1-src.tar.bz2 >>> http://www.lapo.it/cygwin/setup.hint >>> >>> Checksums? >>> 0657f3ef0778ca005ac73e8ab4639ec2bcc808ec >>> b27c1c503e5f70cfc1cc4a2663ed84a33385f954 >> >> Almost forgot... >> >> Linux distro references? >> http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/monotone >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?do_Details=1&ID=1398&K=monotone >> ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/development/SRPMS/monotone-0.23-1.fc5.src.rpm >> >There is also FreeBSD package too. I support adding this package.
There is no reason to vote on the package if there is already a linux reference distribution. FreeBSD is not relevant in this case. Are there any volunteers who would be willing to modernize http://cygwin.com/setup.html to make this policy clear? cgf
