On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:31:02AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> V??clav Haisman wrote: >>> There is also FreeBSD package too. I support adding this package. >>> >I wonder who's crazy enough to mantain it. <giggle> >> There is no reason to vote on the package if there is already a >> linux reference distribution. FreeBSD is not relevant in this case. >> >What is missing, in this case, is a good old review of the packaging >itself, if my internal memory is not yet ready for the trash...
Right. We still need a GTG. >> Are there any volunteers who would be willing to modernize >> http://cygwin.com/setup.html to make this policy clear? >> >I see the it isn't outdated, that part it's just missing. ;) >I'll try to write something tomorrow and post it on the list. I suspect that there are parts of the page which could use some updating which is why I couched the request more general terms but, yes, the "new" rules should be spelled out there. cgf