-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Faylor wrote: > I suspect that there are parts of the page which could use some updating > which is why I couched the request more general terms but, yes, the > "new" rules should be spelled out there. I began with the last section, separating it in two (submitting new packages vs updating existing packages) and including "submission rules".
I guess the other message (with the HTML in attach) didn't get thru, so here it is: http://cyberx.lapo.it/~lapo/cygpackage.html Lapo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJDvPpKAAoJELBiMTth2oCD82UQALaVTZi9MYlZnjmV7wgnfGEM +Ep2t334ZZAcmKxk5vDfO85Q8Pbvv6nzW5NoBxDwJePnM5WsFt4v1pu2PjAkG7wt 6cLdSYTcYCo8UcW1pBjjRYTVwa8iiAn/UVv8Ui85wNyTtWYh5cMCTfp7xotYEovA wwMFzVhXE3Vju14ibId46cFr9fTPm6FAndHeF56wzPUbT+tvYDcm8deT9+GSWKFq v9xnLsuXagaJx98WuR8rJO3LGamP+tV2a0k1IKR05qglbEsolkci668MxnUzz5pP 4aUEBZexusxnHDFgGGok4kL7D0cwbk1XIL+dE3urIDO8drlvrhLBm6Zlpzr3Xaq7 QbCUCRRBKfgqs2HOHCOEx+tkCzeKBx902fWeD0nqvaGGxv/lSvgasF7E2VA+iUYZ KrfVZRw6l5wuaQ1gkoxckTyD9FdW47knVNjRvYRQ/GaJ02j+G/vTiy0JdMbcLoMl wXo6GvveR2tGT2Q73X3s5hcxdtZJP/HQqJGLaLTOJIL7CqQcxffhFP+4c4Ui3XxF EpXOxuvx1Y8XhD91GMBVId47w04F0JIjLKhvkggkAnRTNiXUAWBGmQSZQ9GojhGZ FTk9PmtcwisvfYpBB3AqJ92UWgQyUngZQm19hVaoWU+tRBewEN6x1tmEyngv3+ZD sMot/JuJ9PNm1MNyWuc7 =pbw0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----