On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:25:27PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >Dave & Diane schrieb: >>Hello! >> >>I would like to propose a new package, mlcscope for cygwin. I would like >>to become the maintainer of this package. I have resolved the issues >>that Reini raised and am ready for another try... >> >>I'm including the setup.hint: >> >>$ cat setup.hint >># comment >>sdesc: "Lucent version of cscope for multiple languages (mlcscope)" >>ldesc: "Lucent version of cscope for multiple languages (mlcscope). >>mlcscope is a source code browser tool allowing developers to simplify >>searching source code. mlcscope differs from cscope by using >>separate parsers for C/C++ and Java. mlcscope is developed by >>Lucent Technologies." >>requires: cygwin libncurses8 >>category: Devel >> >> >>As far as I am aware, mlcscope is not available in any major Linux >>distribution. >> >>I have placed the packages to be reviewed at >>http://www.lowtechnet.com/cscope : >> >>http://www.lowtechnet.com/cscope/mlcscope-14.1.8-1-src.tar.bz2 >>http://www.lowtechnet.com/cscope/mlcscope-14.1.8-1.tar.bz2 >>http://www.lowtechnet.com/cscope/setup.hint > >[no GTG] There's still no README in CYGWIN-PATCHES and no instructions >how to build from src. You have to look into the binary packaged >/usr/share/doc/Cygwin/mlcscope-14.1.8.README to get a hint.
Please excuse my ignorance but have we gotten the requisite number of votes for this package? I'm just mentioning this to set expectations. I don't want anyone to assume that a GTG would mean inclusion in the distribution if we haven't gotten the right number of votes. cgf