No we haven't - I was hoping that once Reini was satisfied, the other
votes would quickly follow...
Thanks for checking though.
Cheers
Dave
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:25:27PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
Dave & Diane schrieb:
Hello!
I would like to propose a new package, mlcscope for cygwin. I would like
to become the maintainer of this package. I have resolved the issues
that Reini raised and am ready for another try...
I'm including the setup.hint:
$ cat setup.hint
# comment
sdesc: "Lucent version of cscope for multiple languages (mlcscope)"
ldesc: "Lucent version of cscope for multiple languages (mlcscope).
mlcscope is a source code browser tool allowing developers to simplify
searching source code. mlcscope differs from cscope by using
separate parsers for C/C++ and Java. mlcscope is developed by
Lucent Technologies."
requires: cygwin libncurses8
category: Devel
As far as I am aware, mlcscope is not available in any major Linux
distribution.
I have placed the packages to be reviewed at
http://www.lowtechnet.com/cscope :
http://www.lowtechnet.com/cscope/mlcscope-14.1.8-1-src.tar.bz2
http://www.lowtechnet.com/cscope/mlcscope-14.1.8-1.tar.bz2
http://www.lowtechnet.com/cscope/setup.hint
[no GTG] There's still no README in CYGWIN-PATCHES and no instructions
how to build from src. You have to look into the binary packaged
/usr/share/doc/Cygwin/mlcscope-14.1.8.README to get a hint.
Please excuse my ignorance but have we gotten the requisite number of
votes for this package?
I'm just mentioning this to set expectations. I don't want anyone to
assume that a GTG would mean inclusion in the distribution if we haven't
gotten the right number of votes.
cgf
--
Diane & Dave
http://www.velvetstarbears.com/ http://www.kringlecottage.com/
Fortune: The difference between America and England is that the
English think 100 miles is a long distance and the Americans
think 100 years is a long time.
