On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:03:04PM +0900, green fox wrote: >On 1/20/13, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>What *specifically* do you really like? > >+1 for being able to specify custom setup.ini Not a happy moment when >you realize some package is missing, having spent 2 housr to distribute >the blob on the network.
If you are missing a package then sending out a new setup.ini which includes the missing package should fix the problem. I don't see how being able to specify something other than setup.ini helps. Btw, I'm not looking for votes. I'm looking for explanations for why this option is useful. It seems like the described functionality could be handled with just a shell script wrapper. cgf