On 1/21/13, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:03:04PM +0900, green fox wrote: >>On 1/20/13, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>What *specifically* do you really like? >> >>+1 for being able to specify custom setup.ini Not a happy moment when >>you realize some package is missing, having spent 2 housr to distribute >>the blob on the network. > > If you are missing a package then sending out a new setup.ini which > includes the missing package should fix the problem. I don't see how > being able to specify something other than setup.ini helps. > > Btw, I'm not looking for votes. I'm looking for explanations for why > this option is useful. It seems like the described functionality could > be handled with just a shell script wrapper. > > cgf >
Because we do not have a decent package manager fox