On 10/09/2010 22:43, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Looks nice to me with one HUGE caveat: Please maintain the pseudo-sorted > order in cygwin.din. Sorry to have to impose this burden on you.
No, that's fine; I've never been sure whether we need to care about the ordinal numbers or not in that file. (AFAIK, we don't have any realistic scenarios where anyone would be linking against the Cygwin DLL by ordinal imports, but I hate making assumptions based only on my own limited experience...) > Other than that, please check in and thanks for the patch. It was obviously > a lot of work. Heh, actually not all that much. I had one of those in-the-zone moments and did both this and the gnu ld plugin infrastructure in one ~20h no-sleep coding binge, then spent another few hours tidying it up after I'd slept a bit! So, I'll fix the cygwin.din and check in shortly. Thanks for reviewing. (BTW, the request for advice re: automated compliance checking stands; I would really like to run some proper formal testsuites against this, even if they don't fully work on Cygwin. Eric, surely you've looked at this stuff? I was certainly hoping so, anyway!) cheers, DaveK