Hi Dave, On Sep 11 08:11, Dave Korn wrote: > On 11/09/2010 06:10, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:42:49AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > >> On 10/09/2010 22:43, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> > >>> Looks nice to me with one HUGE caveat: Please maintain the pseudo-sorted > >>> order in cygwin.din. Sorry to have to impose this burden on you. > >> No, that's fine; I've never been sure whether we need to care about the > >> ordinal numbers or not in that file. (AFAIK, we don't have any realistic > >> scenarios where anyone would be linking against the Cygwin DLL by ordinal > >> imports, but I hate making assumptions based only on my own limited > >> experience...) > > > > It never even occurred to me about ordinal numbers but since I've been > > reorganizing that file for years I guess it hasn't been a problem. > > I checked. Something somewhere sorts all the exports it turns out, so they > all get ordinals assigned in alphanumeric sort order anyway, regardless of > cygwin.din order. So, I ended up committing it like so:
Can you please add some words to doc/new-features.sgml? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat