Hi all http://sourceforge.net/projects/ibsxnet/
Ok, the First Release of this Project (ICA Citrix Metaframe altenative Client for X11 with Gygwin) is released. This Project is published under the GPL (is this ok but the Project need Cygwin Binaries?) How does it works: The Logon Client looks like an little Win32 GUI App (Look & Feel) It connect via an SSH2 connection to the LINUX X11-Server (in my Case Debian 3.0) to an an OpenBSD SSH Server and authenticates with an Users thadts must be present on the Linux System (such as root or an other User) On the login to the Linux System the bash_profile Batshscript was calling "always" a x11netini.sh Script thad catch an Commandlineargument (xnet100_hook). If the Hook is 100 then it Startup the KDE-Desktop "startkde" Properties: An Tabbed Register Dialog is implemented for some User defiened Actions, but it is Password protected (password is: qrzx) Bad things: This is NOT a Full funtional Version 1.0.0 and the UI Layout is in German Lang and the Sourcecode is not yet added this Time) ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Thomas Chadwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 8:53 AM Subject: Re: Cygwin Remote: Want to implement a Citrix Metaframe alternative > Hi all, > > The Implementation of my Cygwin Logon Programm works fine, > but the Workarraound with SAMBA (Singlesign on is not the real Deal) > has any One an Idea? > > I want to try an Implementaton of SSH2 Protokoll to my Client to make > the Authentication to my X-Server (via SSH witout the Cygwin Bash) > > I dont want (like commercial StarWin implementation use th "insecure XPDM" > Protocol. > > Note: I tryin to register my Project on Sourceforge.org to make it common > avaiable under the GPL. (searchname: xnet) > > > > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 8:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I have handled the Problem with ssh-keygen -t dsa to bake up an Key-pair > > > and distribute it to the X-Server and Cygwin Client. > > > > Do these keys have passphrases? If yes, then how is it different to > asking > > for a password. If no, then how have you made the system secure? > > > > I am interested in the development of this idea, but would be very > concerned > > about the use of passphrase-less keys. > > > > Rasjid. > > >
