On 2/26/2014 16:29, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:26:59PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> The common case would be for a shell to show up in /etc/shells. Under >> Fedora adds the shell to /etc/shells when the shell package is >> installed. I don't see any reason for us to do anything different. > Rephrasing that in English: > > Under Fedora, shells add themselves to /etc/shells file when they are > installed. > > cgf > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Yep. At least for common shells. If someone is super security conscious, they can police their /etc/shells file. But the most common usage would be to simply allow a shell that's installed, since if a person installed a shell, you can safely presume they want to use it.
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple