Earnie, Linux is most certainly not "Unix for the PC." Linux runs on a very wide variety of processor architectures, even if the Intel x86 constitutes the largest portion of its installed base. I, for example, have run Linux primarily on PowerPC. Randall Schulz Teknowledge Corp. Palo Alto, CA USA At 02:14 PM 10/13/2000 , Earnie Boyd wrote: >--- "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Well, isn't Linux intended to be Unix for the PC? I think the discussion is >about standards and DJ is asking if Linux should be the standard to follow. I >believe that Linux is both POSIX and GNU compliant which covers your 1 and 2 >numbered points. As for number 3, that's a different question, although I >agree that if it adds to portability then it might be considered. > >Cheers, >Earnie Boyd -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility DJ Delorie
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Chris Faylor
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Corinna Vinschen
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Chris Faylor
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Gerrit Haase
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Earnie Boyd
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility DJ Delorie
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Earnie Boyd
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Chris Faylor
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility DJ Delorie
- RE: RFC: linux compatibility Randall R Schulz
- RE: RFC: linux compatibility Robinow, David
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Chris Faylor
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Corinna Vinschen
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Tom Hutto
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Corinna Vinschen
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Tom Hutto
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Brian . P . Kasper
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility John . Velman
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Earnie Boyd
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility DJ Delorie
