> Which is a different consideration, SYSV vs BSD. I've noticed that > some packages port better using BSD and some port better using SYSV. > It will give Cygwin more coherence if you can say which standard we > try to follow. I am hoping that, by choosing Linux, it won't matter. Things will get ported to Linux, regardless of whether it's SYSV or BSD they use. Once ported to Linux, Cygwin ports should be easy. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility tprinceusa
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Gary R. Van Sickle
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility DJ Delorie
- RE: RFC: linux compatibility Gary R. Van Sickle
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility DJ Delorie
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Chris Faylor
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Corinna Vinschen
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Chris Faylor
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Gerrit Haase
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Earnie Boyd
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility DJ Delorie
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Earnie Boyd
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Chris Faylor
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility DJ Delorie
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Randall R Schulz
- RE: RFC: linux compatibility Robinow, David
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Chris Faylor
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Corinna Vinschen
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Tom Hutto
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Corinna Vinschen
- Re: RFC: linux compatibility Tom Hutto
