Re: RFC: linux compatibility

[Corinna Vinschen]

Chris Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:59:11PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >What about the "Single Unix Specification" at Opengroup
> 
> I actually have been using the documents at this site as the basis for
> most of the work I do for Cygwin.
> 
> When they don't mention a feature, I usually use Linux.  Unfortunately,
> it's not Red Hat linux, specifically.  Instead it is the cgf linux
> distribution (tm) that I've built up over the years.

That's my favorite order. SUS first, Linux if something is missing in SUS
and as last resort Commodore 64. Uh, oh, forget the last one...

Corinna

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]