egor duda wrote: > > i wholeheartedly agree that lots of cygwin users will benefit from > rock-stable cygwin. the main question is "what cygwin team should do > for this?" To answer this it might be helpful to know where Cygwin is going. I assume that the overall goal is stepwise refinement towards Linuxness or similar. So, how far are we from that goal? -- = Warren -- Video articles: http://www.cyberport.com/~tangent/video/ = = ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? Christopher Dale Campbell
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? Christopher Faylor
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? Charles S. Wilson
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? Christopher Faylor
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stabl... Charles S. Wilson
- Re: When will cygwin ever be s... Christopher Faylor
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? Andy Piper
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? Louis Bohm
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? egor duda
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stabl... Earnie Boyd
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stabl... Warren Young
- Re: When will cygwin ever be s... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: When will cygwin ever be s... Robert Collins
- Re: When will cygwin ever ... Christopher Faylor
- Screen buffer position lost (WAS: When... Harold Hunt
- Re: Screen buffer position lost (W... Christopher Faylor
- RE: Screen buffer position los... Harold Hunt
- Re: Screen buffer position... Christopher Faylor
- RE: When will cygwin ever be stable? Robert Collins
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? Andy Piper
- Re: When will cygwin ever be stable? Charles S. Wilson