Right, we won't use nukes, we'll just use 'depleted' uranium core artillery, thermobaric bunker busters (aka mini-nukes), daisy cutters and MOABS; After all, those aren't weapons of mass destruction.
----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--------------------------- + ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\ \|/ :and didn't stop 9-11|share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\ <--*-->:Instead of rewarding|monitor, or under your keyboard, you \/|\/ /|\ :their failures, we |don't email them, or put them on a web \|/ + v + :should get refunds! |site, and you must change them very often. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net ------------ On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, James A. Donald wrote: > This "US will not retaliate" argument seems insane. Maybe the > US would not use nukes, but whatever it did use, everyone in > the political apparatus of Mexico would be dead, and and some > impressive bits of China and or Russia would be in flames.
