At 08:01 PM 2/11/00 -0500, Colin A. Reed wrote: >Actually, the problems you suggest here could actually be seen as good >things. A lot of these, such as the negative conotations of sexuality >are functions of seriously disfunctional societies, families, and >individuals. Frankly I don't give a rat's ass about 'curing' what *you* diagnose as dysfunctional or hypocritical cultures, and I *certainly* don't want to depend on your or their continued indulgence for my freedom. The right to manipulate symbols arbitrarily shall not be infringed. Much like trade secrets, he nat'l security secrets you whine about are controlled, voluntarily, from their source; no infringement of anyone's rights there. So get over it. ---- "Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy." --Rand
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy ... Lizard
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Priv... Matthew Gaylor
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional ... Lizard
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressi... Matthew Gaylor
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congr... Lizard
- Re: Privacy Caucus, Books,... Bill Stewart
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional ... Duncan Frissell
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy Cauc... Lizard
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy Cauc... Duncan Frissell
- Re: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy Caucus William H. Geiger III
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy Caucus David Honig
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy Caucus Petro
- Re: RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy ... Duncan Frissell
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy Caucus Lisa S. Dean
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy Caucus David Honig
- RE: FCF's Dean Lauds Congressional Privacy Caucus Bill Stewart