On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 19:08:51 -0700
"Stephen D. Williams" <s...@lig.net> wrote:

> On 9/3/16 7:07 PM, juan wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 18:08:41 -0700
> > "Stephen D. Williams" <s...@lig.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>   
> >>> http://activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html
> >>>
> >>>   "Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,  anonymous
> >>> networks, digital pseudonyms, zero knowledge, reputations,
> >>> information markets,  black markets, collapse of governments."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>   What are the last three words there?
> >> What is the whole paragraph? 
> >     Are you too drunk to read, too stupid to read, or what.
> > Maybe try ctrl-f? Actually, you must have seen May's signature
> >     hundreds of times? 
> >
> >     Bah, I don't realliy care. And you seem to have ignored my
> >     previous message, which is probably a good thing so that I
> > don't waste more time replying to a new whole set of absurdities. 
> 
> You're arguing about the meaning of English now?  


        What the fuck are you talking about? 


> You've already lost
> that one.  Regardless of what Tim may or may not have wanted to
> happen in some or all cases, it doesn't say there, or in the
> manifesto.

        Again, what are you talking about. The only one arguing about
        the meaning of english, more specifically, 'arguiing that
        anarchy doesn't mean anarchy, is you.



> 
> >> The only call to action is a non-specific 'arise'. 
> >     ha ha ha - just how far can your bad faith go? I'd bet it's
> >     limitless.
> >
> 
> 
> sdw
> 

Reply via email to