On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 19:08:51 -0700 "Stephen D. Williams" <s...@lig.net> wrote:
> On 9/3/16 7:07 PM, juan wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 18:08:41 -0700 > > "Stephen D. Williams" <s...@lig.net> wrote: > > > > > >>> > >>> http://activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html > >>> > >>> "Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, anonymous > >>> networks, digital pseudonyms, zero knowledge, reputations, > >>> information markets, black markets, collapse of governments." > >>> > >>> > >>> What are the last three words there? > >> What is the whole paragraph? > > Are you too drunk to read, too stupid to read, or what. > > Maybe try ctrl-f? Actually, you must have seen May's signature > > hundreds of times? > > > > Bah, I don't realliy care. And you seem to have ignored my > > previous message, which is probably a good thing so that I > > don't waste more time replying to a new whole set of absurdities. > > You're arguing about the meaning of English now? What the fuck are you talking about? > You've already lost > that one. Regardless of what Tim may or may not have wanted to > happen in some or all cases, it doesn't say there, or in the > manifesto. Again, what are you talking about. The only one arguing about the meaning of english, more specifically, 'arguiing that anarchy doesn't mean anarchy, is you. > > >> The only call to action is a non-specific 'arise'. > > ha ha ha - just how far can your bad faith go? I'd bet it's > > limitless. > > > > > sdw >