On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:40:12 +1000
"James A. Donald" <jam...@echeque.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:38:54 -0800
> > Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote:
> >> The footage speaks for itself.
>
> On 1/9/2017 8:44 AM, juan wrote:
> > Indeed. It clearly shows a building falling on its footprint
>
> Liar
>
...is what you are =)
As to the rest of your message, I already addressed the point
two times. But I'll do it again...
> Because WTC 7 was falling sideways before it fell downwards, it did
> not fall on its own footprint.
>
>
> The building was falling apart, piece by piece, in an irregular and
> uneven fashion, until it finally collapsed downwards all at once
>
> First the fuel tank fell down demolishing much of the building's
> interior.
Oh really? The fuel tank "demolished the building"? Perhaps
it had some help from giant mutant rats that crawled out of
manhattan mud?
Anyway, the collapse of the roof is indeed, again, mostly
symmetrical. You can clearly see a dent in the MIDDLE of the
roof. Which happens to be another characteristical feature of
CD.
>
> Then a while after that, quite a while after that, the roof buckles.
> With the roof losing rigidity, there is nothing to stop the building
> from leaning to one side.
Indeed BOTH (shorter) sides of the building lean INWARDS A FEW
DEGREES, and that's what controlled demolition is all about.
Aa I already mentioned 2 times, and I'll mention again, WTC7 is
an especially clean example of controlled demolition.
Compare to other buildings blown up here and report back.
staring at 13:20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQgVCj7q49o
> It proceeds to lean to one side, very
> slowly at first, then faster and faster, like a tree falling over,
> then collapses downwards all at once, no longer like a tree but like
> a building.
>
> Yes, the final fall, collapsing downwards all at once is just like a
> controlled demolition -
And so is the onset of the collapse. Also, it is painfully
obvious that tens of thousands of tons of steel and the
rest of the building can't fall at free fall speed unless
columns are cut AT REGULAR INTERVALS.
> but the half hour leading up to that was
> things falling apart in a way totally unlike controlled demolition,
> and the few seconds leading up to collapsing downwards all at once
> was the building falling to one side, the complete opposite of a
> symmetric collapse.
>
