> On Jan 9, 2017, at 4:57 PM, juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:40:12 +1000 > "James A. Donald" <jam...@echeque.com> wrote: > >>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:38:54 -0800 >>> Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote: >>>> The footage speaks for itself. >> >>> On 1/9/2017 8:44 AM, juan wrote: >>> Indeed. It clearly shows a building falling on its footprint >> >> Liar >> > ...is what you are =) > > As to the rest of your message, I already addressed the point > two times. But I'll do it again... > > > > > >> Because WTC 7 was falling sideways before it fell downwards, it did >> not fall on its own footprint. >> >> >> The building was falling apart, piece by piece, in an irregular and >> uneven fashion, until it finally collapsed downwards all at once >> >> First the fuel tank fell down demolishing much of the building's >> interior. > > > Oh really? The fuel tank "demolished the building"? Perhaps > it had some help from giant mutant rats that crawled out of > manhattan mud? > > Anyway, the collapse of the roof is indeed, again, mostly > symmetrical. You can clearly see a dent in the MIDDLE of the > roof. Which happens to be another characteristical feature of > CD. > > > > > >> >> Then a while after that, quite a while after that, the roof buckles. >> With the roof losing rigidity, there is nothing to stop the building >> from leaning to one side. > > > Indeed BOTH (shorter) sides of the building lean INWARDS A FEW > DEGREES, and that's what controlled demolition is all about. > > Aa I already mentioned 2 times, and I'll mention again, WTC7 is > an especially clean example of controlled demolition. > > Compare to other buildings blown up here and report back. > > staring at 13:20 > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQgVCj7q49o > > > > >> It proceeds to lean to one side, very >> slowly at first, then faster and faster, like a tree falling over, >> then collapses downwards all at once, no longer like a tree but like >> a building. >> >> Yes, the final fall, collapsing downwards all at once is just like a >> controlled demolition - > > > And so is the onset of the collapse. Also, it is painfully > obvious that tens of thousands of tons of steel and the > rest of the building can't fall at free fall speed unless > columns are cut AT REGULAR INTERVALS. > > > > >> but the half hour leading up to that was >> things falling apart in a way totally unlike controlled demolition, >> and the few seconds leading up to collapsing downwards all at once >> was the building falling to one side, the complete opposite of a >> symmetric collapse. >> >
Fucking hilarious watching faux-engineers argue about the pedantic details of shit they don't understand in the advance of a conspiracy theory that is such a dramatic over explanation of what really happened, it's just fucking absurd... I watched the second plane fly into the tower live on television. US foreign policy came home to roost. You don't need to be a "truther" to make the US the bad guy. But, i should expect such theories from people who think anthropic climate change is a hoax. Which, hilariously, is now the CONSENSUS view of the US republican government :)