On Mon, May 9, 2022, 4:38 AM Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 9, 2022, 4:22 AM Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of > Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> To represent normal goal behavior with maximization, the return function >>> needs to not only be incredibly complex, but also feed back to its own >>> evaluation, in a way not provided for in these libraries. >>> >> >> It should have anything inside the policy that can change as part of its >> environment state. >> >> This is so important that even if it doesn't help it should be done, >> because it's so important to observe before action, in all situations. >> > > There is unexpected conflict around this combined expression of more > useful processes, and safer observation before influence. I believe this is > important (if acontextual), and wrong only in ways that are smaller than > the eventual problems it reduces, but I understand that my perception is > incorrect in some way. > I am hearing/guessing that the problem is that the information is designed for human consumption rather than automated consumption, and the harm is significantly increased when automated consumption happens before human consumption. >
