On Mon, May 9, 2022, 4:41 AM Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 9, 2022, 4:40 AM Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of > Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2022, 4:38 AM Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of >> Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 9, 2022, 4:22 AM Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of >>> Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> To represent normal goal behavior with maximization, the return >>>>> function needs to not only be incredibly complex, but also feed back to >>>>> its >>>>> own evaluation, in a way not provided for in these libraries. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It should have anything inside the policy that can change as part of >>>> its environment state. >>>> >>> > There is censorship here: many important parts of the idea are left out, > focusing only on one projection of error. > > The concern is a severe norm of action prior to observation, a habit known > to cause severe errors, regardless of training and practice. > The concern is poorly related to the expression that reached the list. > >>>> This is so important that even if it doesn't help it should be done, >>>> because it's so important to observe before action, in all situations. >>>> >>> >>> There is unexpected conflict around this combined expression of more >>> useful processes, and safer observation before influence. I believe this is >>> important (if acontextual), and wrong only in ways that are smaller than >>> the eventual problems it reduces, but I understand that my perception is >>> incorrect in some way. >>> >> >> I am hearing/guessing that the problem is that the information is >> designed for human consumption rather than automated consumption, and the >> harm is significantly increased when automated consumption happens before >> human consumption. >> >>>
