On Mon, May 9, 2022, 4:40 AM Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 9, 2022, 4:38 AM Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of > Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2022, 4:22 AM Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of >> Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> To represent normal goal behavior with maximization, the return function >>>> needs to not only be incredibly complex, but also feed back to its own >>>> evaluation, in a way not provided for in these libraries. >>>> >>> >>> It should have anything inside the policy that can change as part of its >>> environment state. >>> >> There is censorship here: many important parts of the idea are left out, focusing only on one projection of error. The concern is a severe norm of action prior to observation, a habit known to cause severe errors, regardless of training and practice. >>> This is so important that even if it doesn't help it should be done, >>> because it's so important to observe before action, in all situations. >>> >> >> There is unexpected conflict around this combined expression of more >> useful processes, and safer observation before influence. I believe this is >> important (if acontextual), and wrong only in ways that are smaller than >> the eventual problems it reduces, but I understand that my perception is >> incorrect in some way. >> > > I am hearing/guessing that the problem is that the information is designed > for human consumption rather than automated consumption, and the harm is > significantly increased when automated consumption happens before human > consumption. > >>
