Steve,
Even assuming that what you say is true, and I suspect it is,
you'd be relying on protections enshrined in the law. The purpose
of this treaty, of course, is to change the law. :)
-Declan
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:07:33AM -0700, Steve Schear wrote:
> At 10:56 AM 4/30/2001 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:24:09PM -0700, Steve Schear wrote:
> > > What if the sysadmin is intentionally located in an offshore location so
> > > that they cannot be kept from notifying all users of the logging order?
> >
> >Then we pass a "cybercrime" treaty to require them to follow U.S. laws.
>
> Ahhh, but who is the "them"? My understanding is that under state and
> Federal law only executives and those with signature authority can be held
> criminally responsible for their actions. U.S. corporations can be created
> and administered solely by non-residents (only an in-state legal service
> point is generally required.). Nevada corporations can be held in bearer
> form shielding beneficial owners.
>
> steve
