> I just read our FAQ and it does not say that. "The intention is to make it a drop-in replacement for existing Pyrex code."
If this is not the meaning you intended, then you may want to change the way the FAQ reads. > I wrote "fork" because that's exactly how you describe > PyMill on the Pymill trac server page: http://pysoy.org:8000/ > That page disappeared so I can't paste from it. That "page" is a development tracd that is not open to the public and nothing on it is official in any way. The numerous broken images on it should have been a clue, if the port wasn't enough. Your reposting it here was the reason it was moved to another port. The reason we're not using the name "PyMill" in any public posting is that may not even be the name we end up with. There's a good chance it isn't. We're nowhere near the point of publishing a definition of it. You'll notice my blog entry didn't use the name. In fact your entire panic mode seems to be derived from a warped sense of importance of a posting to our internal development list a link you followed from it to a draft site we're working from. Nothing you pasted, besides a link to the blog entry, was read by the general Python community until you posted it here. Again - if there's something in the blog posting that is inaccurate, specify it, and I'll correct it. That is the only referenced place where FUD (sic) could have been spread, since everything else was internal. _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
