Hi, Arc Riley wrote: >> I just read our FAQ and it does not say that. > > "The intention is to make it a drop-in replacement for existing Pyrex code."
Right, "existing" Pyrex code. We are not necessarily talking about newly developed code that uses new Pyrex features, neither are we talking about code that uses Cython features that are not supported by Pyrex. Cython is not Pyrex, otherwise we wouldn't have two code bases. That aside, language compatibility between Cython and Pyrex *is* a goal. It would be stupid to have two compilers that understand almost the same language, and allow them to diverge in subtleties that make it impossible for users to change between the two if they need to. The latest discussion with Greg on the integer-loop syntax should make it clear that Cython and Pyrex are not fundamentally diverging projects. And I really don't think they should be. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
