Hi, Greg Ewing wrote: > Stefan Behnel wrote: > >> The latest discussion with Greg on the integer-loop syntax should make it >> clear that Cython and Pyrex are not fundamentally diverging projects. And I >> really don't think they should be. > > That's good to hear.
And I really mean it. We even adapted our versioning scheme to Pyrex and put a great deal of work into merging the changes in Pyrex 0.9.6. > However, if one of the priorities > of Cython is really going to be to compile pure Python code, > there are likely to be problems at some point, because > I'm going to want to make Pyrex do things that you won't > like, and vice versa. As long as there is a way to discuss these things and decide that the difference is worth it, that's fine. > BTW, the discussion we've been having about isinstance > vs. typecheck is a bit ironic in this light. I'm arguing > for *more* compatibility with Python in this area, > and you're arguing for *less*. :-) Read my answer. :) This is not about Python compatibility, as it deals with the semantics of C types. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
