Stefan Behnel wrote: > But I think we're getting back into details before their time here. I'm > fine with disallowing this completely at the beginning, and to come up > with sensible semantics when we see what common use cases are.
Yes, I was just trying to get a better grip on what you were thinking with two view types. If there's no big usecase for arithmetic operators on them in the first place, I see no harm in having a i_really_know_how_simd_works_now_let_me_shoot_myself_in_the_foot directive enabling SIMD on views, enabling us to simplify and only have one view type (i.e. it wouldn't "switch" semantics, only allow semantics, which seems like a safer directive). -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
