Robert Bradshaw wrote: > IIRC part of the motivation for int[:,:] syntax rather than > special_name[int, ndim=2] was that the former is actually easier for > humans to parse. Personally, it seems a natural extension of the int > [50] syntax.
I would be happier if it followed the C pattern more closely by appearing on the right instead of the left in a declaration, i.e. cdef int my_array[:,:] As long as colons or ellipses are always used in this form of declaration (am I right in thinking that's the case?) then this is distinguishable from a plain array declaration. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
