Robert Bradshaw, 25.03.2010 09:53: > On Mar 25, 2010, at 1:39 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > It's not the closures code that's holding anything up, as far as I > know it's ready to go (with a small type inferencing issue, which > could be easily resolved at first by disabling type inference for > closures).
... and which then lead to a reproducible, GC related crash in Hudson: Doctest: closure_tests_4.__test__.g1923 (line 205) ... python: Modules/gcmodule.c:277: visit_decref: Assertion `gc->gc.gc_refs != 0' failed. So, it's not ready for a merge yet, and we may still run into more problems while fixing it up. As I said, I don't mind if we get it fixed within a couple of weeks so that 0.14 follows 0.13 closely. We never kept an old branch alive for that much longer when we release a new one. > It's the fact that Sage doesn't (didn't?) compile with the > latest cython-devel tip. Ah, ok, I wasn't aware of that. Sounds like we should get the sagelib into Hudson rather sooner than later then. Does it look like big trouble all over the place or is it just a few things that look fixable at first glance? Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
