Robert Bradshaw, 19.11.2010 01:35: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 17.11.2010 11:39: >>> Forgetting about the git aspect for a moment, I'm strongly in favor of a >>> DVCS-centered site. That is, +1 to bitbucket, github, gitorious, ++, and >>> -1 to SourceForge, Google Code, etc. >> >> I guess it's bitbucket then? Switching the VCS just because of a project >> hosting site sounds like more trouble than I'm currently after. > > Would you be opposed to switching? In other words, is that a > deal-breaker, or simply not worth doing assuming there were no great > advantage?
Let's say, I'm -0 on switching to git. I never really used it except for a couple of times where I had to and that already gave me a scratching itch in my neck that told me I was touching something crude. That feeling may be wrong, but maybe not. ;-) However, I'm already happily using hgsvn to talk to SVN, so as long as the history can be preserved 100% (which is likely the case), and as long as I (and others) have the choice to do the switch or not, I'll be fine. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
