On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Fernando Perez <fperez....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Robert Bradshaw > <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: >> It seems that the clear consensus, or at least the one thing that we >> can all be happy about, is moving to GitHub (crossing our fingers that > > Great news, glad to hear that! > >> the issue tracker improves quickly). I've created >> https://github.com/cython > > Minor note: I'd suggest that instead of having > > https://github.com/cython/cython > > be a fork of > > https://github.com/dagss/cython > > you seed it with a new repo (which can be a local clone of Dag's), so > that the fork tree starts at the official repo and not one particular > devleoper's. > > It's a minor point, but I always find it nicer to look at organization > repos that start there, rather than starting at some random > developer's repo. It also reduces the chances that people > accidentally fork from the other one, creating a less obvious network > in the long run.
Good point, I'll do that. I agree, much harder to fix in retrospect... - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
