Ed Leafe wrote: > On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:19 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > >> Of course I'm just spouting without having an implementation, and >> I'm sure there are >> (surmountable) problems with my ideas. ;) > > Well, like I said before: I agree with the ideas, having tried to > work that way myself. The seemingly innocent notion of instantiating > an instance of a superclass cost me several months of development time.
Ok fair enough. Just one more thing: I'm not talking about instantiating superclasses, but instantiating the subclass we are editing in the ClassDesigner. The default value for properties in the subclass will be whatever the value in the instance is. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: Dabo-users@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
