On 03/31/2012 06:24 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Mar 30, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > >> I don't think an observer would even be needed. The dynamic properties are >> already >> properties, with getter methods. So, the evaluation of the dynamic property >> simply >> needs to happen in the dynamic property's getter. > > I looked over the code, and I have a few ideas that might make this > simpler. > > First, the methods for the dynamic updates are dunder methods, making > them inaccessible from outside the object being updated. We need to either > change them to "public" methods, or provide a public method that will in turn > call the dunder methods. > > Second, I think we need to raise two form-level events: > > 1) ValueChanged, which would be raised when any of the form's controls raises > a ValueChanged event. This would enable objects to respond when any control > on the form changes its value. > > 2) FocusChanged, which would be raised when focus changes from one control to > another. This would enable controls to respond to the user navigating within > a form. > > Ideas?
I think the two new events would be helpful in general. I am not sure how that deals with the OP's desire not to tie a Dynamic* property to an event. I am going to assume that is going to be handled by making the Dynamic methods public? > > > -- Ed Leafe > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: Dabo-users@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/4f77104c.6010...@gmail.com
