Hi all, sorry for the lack of time to step in earlier, we are expecting our first born and it obviously follows IETF processes, since she has already missed a milestone (be born) by a week, so my thought are little bit elsewhere at this moment.
I would like every to please take a deep breath before continuing in this discussion (you know the drill -> write an email, save it into a drafts, go to sleep, check the email in the morning, send it only if it seems to be still ok). I think we have a consensus that the proposed change is correct. If not, please correct me. It seems we have three different course of actions possible and as we still believe in the opinion of the WG (and the consensus), and I agree with all three points below, I would like to have a quick vote (is week ok?) on the topic: a) do nothing b) accept errata as is c) start work on RFC6698bis and include this change Please try to limit your response to a), b) or c), so we our thread don't turn into a threat as we have observed many times on this list. If I did miss an option, please change the subject to your proposal and clearly state the option and reasoning. Thank you, Ondrej On 20. 4. 2013, at 8:19, SM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Viktor, > At 22:25 19-04-2013, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> Lack of RFC WG consensus does not trump simple deductive logic, >> which remains irrefutably true even if the group did not explicitly >> endorse it. >> >> You repeat the same assertion, but still with no justification, >> what is the change you speak of? > > I expressed my opinion. I can be wrong. I'll explain my point of view: > > (a) The working group has to decide what to do about this erratum. > > (b) I do not have to convince the working group about whether to approve the > erratum or not to approve it. > > (c) I read the messages on this thread and I gathered that my opinion would > not make any difference. I am ok with that. -- Ondřej Surý -- Chief Science Officer ------------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic mailto:[email protected] http://nic.cz/ tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112 -------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
